pragmatic contradiction,
a contradiction that is generated by pragmatic rather than logical implication.
A logically implies B if it is impossible for B to be false if A is true,
whereas A pragmatically implies B if in most (but not necessarily all)
contexts, saying ‘A’ can reasonably be taken as indicating that B is true.
Thus, if I say, “It’s raining,” what I say does not logically imply that I
believe that it is raining, since it is possible for it to be raining without
my believing it is. Nor does my saying that it is raining logically imply that
I believe that it is, since it is possible for me to say this without believing
it. But my saying this does pragmatically imply that I believe that it is
raining, since normally my saying this can reasonably be taken to indicate that
I believe it. Accordingly, if I were to say, “It’s raining but I don’t believe
that it’s raining,” the result would be a pragmatic contradiction. The first
part (“It’s raining”) does not logically imply the negation of the second part
(“I don’t believe that it’s raining”) but my saying the first part does
pragmatically imply the negation of the second part.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment