Grice considers (PPQ, vol. 67, p. 14) Davidson's candid:
(Ex)KICKED (Shaun, Shem, x)
"This goes against our natural instincts and inlicnations"
"Are we to regard 'kicked'"
in
Shaun kicked Shem.
"not as a simple dyadic predicate,"
"but as a three place predicate:
one place for the kicker,
a second place for the kicked,
and "an extra vacancy for reference
to the EVENT or action in which that
KICKING consists of?"
Enough to say: "Do not multiply Davidsons beyond necessity!"
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment