by JLS
for the GC
-- KRAMER in "Funny you should mention that":
"Cavett relates that Linkletter would spoil jokes by making explicit what is usually left for the audience to realize."
Good. There's also the punchline. Calvin has a good one at that in the youtube link provided by Kramer about the 'honeymoon' frame or 'script': 'it's all about the f*ck'.
The closest Grice came to humour, explicitly is what he 'shaggy dog'. I mean, why else choose
"The dog is shaggy" as an example of predication.
I like to think he was having a long shaggy dog story in mind. Or not.
----
Conversational structures of joke telling is very good. Atkinson/Heritage have a piece in their "Conversation Analysis" book with C. U. P. which I should revise. Of course we have to consider various contexts:
1 co-participant.
2 co-participants,
etc.
It seems it has to be (b) at least, to count as 'spoiling' or 'killing' the joke by explicaturising the implicature.
----
Note this is like the 'enthymeme', only different. A punchline does not really need to be involved in what Kramer is commenting above.
Making explicit the implicit should be criminalised. I know it killed Grice.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment