Saul's blurb/abstract for her Nous piece

"Davis argues that Gricean theory cannot accommodate the roles of convention and speaker intention in conversational implicature. I take issue with both these claims (in very different ways), but, nonetheless, concede that many of the more specific points Davis makes pose some serious problems for Gricean theory. Davis also offers his own positive account, and I argue that many of the problems Davis raises for Grice are ones that also pose trouble for Davis's own account"