The Grice Club

Welcome

The Grice Club

The club for all those whose members have no (other) club.

Is Grice the greatest philosopher that ever lived?

Search This Blog

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Sesquipedanialism

To what extent a fallacious arguer is "arguing"?
Should we restrict "arguing" or "reasoning" to
"good" samples?
(cfr Luciano Fioridi on information).
I don't think so!

I would use Grice's word "aspect".
There is a good aspect (positively valued) of reasoning, and
There is a bad aspect (negatively valued),

where - within the latter - I would distinguish betweeen

1. fallacy (Griceanly UNINTENTIONAL)
(nobody wants to commit a mistake intentionally)

2. SOPHISM (Griceanly intentional)
qua figure of SPEECH, or rather
STRATEGEM

i.e. a rational strategy
intented NOT to be recognised by
one's co-conversationalist.

I title all this "Sesquipedanialism" after my mentor in this area, DV Druff.
The idea is that you have to use a technical name to label a fallacy so that
it comes to existence (My point being to what extent knowing what TYPE of
fallacy/sophism one is indulging in helps clarify the matter).


ad vericundiam,
ad baculum,
propter,
hominem,
lapidem,
misericordiam,
mulierem,
non causa pro causa,
intra dictionem, etc...

4 comments:

  1. OK I'll bite. For "sesquipedanialism" to make sense, the D in D.V. Druff would have to stand for "Dan." Dan Druff was your mentor? That flake?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oops. I was never so witty. It was merely a typo for "sesquipedalianism", now a new entry. Sorry, D. V. Druff!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The mistake is easy to make. You were probably thinking of Sesquipedaniel, the porn star with the foot-and-a-half long impregnatorial instrument.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You think. Arnold Zwicky, who has a porn story on the internet somewhere, and coined his "uninvited inferences" with Geiss -- which I rebutted in "The Uninvited Implicature" -- has examined the law behind:

    Wystan Arenales

    -- the name of my pet and the name of my street.

    He has studied male porn star names. He thinks that:

    -- First, porn-writers are WITTY: there is NOT one single porn film which has a literal title to it. They all _implicate_: they have resonances that go beyond the erection. They are meant for enjoyment of the _intellect_.

    -- The names are usually 'artistic', as Sesquipedaniel.Unless you are saying that was his _Christian_ name?

    ReplyDelete