"This paper discusses the coverage of ordinary language philosophy in Scott Soames's 'Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century'."
"After praising the book's virtues, I raise three points where I dissent from Soames's take on the history."
"First, I suggest that there is more to ordinary language philosophy than the rather implausible version of it that Soames sees to have been destroyed by Grice."
---- He meant: That which MATTERS!
"Second, I argue that confusions between analyticity, necessity and priority are less important to the ordinary language period than Soames takes them to be. Finally, I claim that Soames's criticisms of Ryle turn in part on attributing reductionist positions to Ryle that Ryle did not hold."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment