The Grice Club

Welcome

The Grice Club

The club for all those whose members have no (other) club.

Is Grice the greatest philosopher that ever lived?

Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A Philosopher´s Philosopher If Never There Was One

M. D. B. Platts (Mark de Bretton, that is) was born in London, educated at Oxford, and corrupted in Mexico. When I came across Platt´s review in "Mind" for the PGRICE festschrift (Grandy/Warner) I was already familiar with his all too polite "Ways of Meaning". In his review of Mind, he goes over the top.

He quotes Grice as being "a philosopher´s philosopher, if ever there was one". But there NEVER was one. I was at first enchanted by the descript, and used it in published work of mine. But I´ve learned a lesson by now.

Platts meant it derogatorily!

Allow me to explain.

One reads:

(1) Grice was a philosopher´s philosopher, if ever there was one. And even if there never was one.

The first implicature is

(a) "You, reader, are a clever one; for you ARE a philosopher -- not just the man in the street".

But one reads (1) again, and you find out that the implicature starts to be (b):

(b) Grice was NOT a philosopher. He was a philosopher´s philosopher.

This is a bit like "an absolute ban is no ban", as cited by Kramer in his comment to my "lifelong native". But more serious.

Grice would have HATED to be merely a philosopher´s philosopher. For, first, who IS a philosopher?

Is a philosopher, as Platts suggests, someone full-time employed by an American university? Then, yes, Grice was a philosopher´s philosopher. You don´t see him quoted in Magalasya a lot.

If you mean that his "Way of Words", with the 17-clause definition of "utterer´s occasion-meaning of an utterance-part", is not your average beach red, then, yes, he ain´t no woman-in-the-beach type of philosopher.

But Grice wanted to see his-self as along the UNITY of philosophy, longitudinal:


Socrates
Plato
Aristotle

Kant


Grice


And Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were Philosophers Simpliciter, not "philosopher´s philosophers". Ditto Kant. They are studied in PHIL 101. And PHIL 101 is NOT for philosophers. It´s required course for most things civilised.

Ergo, q. e. d.

On the other hand, Derrida is a philosopher´s philosopher.

JLS

No comments:

Post a Comment