Donnellanian implicature

Speranza

Abbott, B., “A reply to Szabó's ‘Descriptions and uniqueness’,” Philosophical Studies, 113.

–––, “Issues in the semantics and pragmatics of definite descriptions" in Jeanette Gundel & Nancy Hedberg, eds., Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61–72.

Abbott, B., and L. Horn,

“Nonfamiliarity and indefinite descriptions,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Pittsburgh.

Bach, K., Thought and Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––, “Quantification, Qualification, and Context: A Reply to Stanley and Szabó,” Mind and Language, 15: 262–283.

–––,  “Descriptions: Points of Reference”, in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds), Descriptions and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–229.

Breheny, R.,  Context Dependence and Procedural Meaning: The Semantics of Definites, Ph.D thesis, Department of Linguistics, University College, London.

Brogaard, B.,  The but not all: A partitive account of plural definite descriptions. Mind and Language, 22: 402–26.

Brown, M.,  “‘On Denoting’ Updated,” Acta Analytica, 8: 7–32.

Burge, T.,  “Reference and Proper Names,” The Journal of Philosophy, 70: 425–439, 1973.

–––,  “Truth and Singular Terms,” in M. Platts (ed.) Reference, Truth and Reality: Essays on the Philosophy of Language, London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 167–181.

Byrne, A. and J. Pryor,  “Bad Intensions”, in Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications, M. Garcia-Carpintero and J. Macia (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 38–54.

Chastain, C.,  “Reference and Context”, in Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume VII, K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pages 194–269.

Chalmers, D.,  “The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics,” in M. Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia, (eds) Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––,  “The Components of Content,” in D. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chien, Y.-C. and K. Wexler,  “Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics.” Language Acquisition, 1: 225–295.

Chomsky, N.,  “Questions of Form and Interpretation,” Linguistic Analysis, 1: 75–109.

Cooper, R.,  “The Interpretation of Pronouns,” in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, New York: Academic Press, 61–92.

Davies, M.,. Meaning, Quantification, Necessity, London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

Davies, M. and Humberstone, L.,  “Two Notions of Necessity,” Philosophical Studies, 38: 1–30.

Devitt, M.,  Designation, New York: Columbia University Press.

–––, “The Case for Referential Descriptions,” in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––,  “Referential Descriptions and Conversational Implicatures,” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 3: 7–32.

Devitt, M., and K. Sterelny, Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Diesing, M.,  Indefinites, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Donnellan, Keith Sedgwick, 1964.“Reference and Definite Descriptions,” rejected by the Philosophical Review, later published in volume 77: 281–304.

–––, “Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora,” in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 47–68. repr. in DONNELLAN

Dummett, M., Frege: Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

–––, 1981. The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, London: Duckworth.

Elbourne, P.,  Situations and Individuals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Eluguardo, R.,  “The Predicate View of Proper Names,” in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–53.

Enç, M.,  “Towards a Referential Analysis of Temporal Expressions,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 405–426.

Evans, G.,  “The Causal Theory of Names,”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary volume), 47: 187–208.

–––,  The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Everett, A., and T. Hofweber (eds.),  Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, Stanford: CSLI Publications. cfr. Grice, "Vacuous Names"

Fara, D.G.,  “Descriptions as Predicates,” Philosophical Studies, 102: 1–42. Published under the name “Delia Graff,”

von Fintel, K.,  “Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presupposition and Truth-Value Intuitions),” in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––, “What is Presuppositional Accommodation, Again?” Philosophical Perspectives, 22: 137–170.

Fodor, J.D., and I. Sag,  “Referential and Quantificational Indefinites,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 5: 355–398.

French, P., and H. Wettstein (eds.),  Midwest Studies in Language XXV: Figurative Language, Oxford: Blackwell.

Gauker, C.,  “Against Accommodation: Heim and van der Sandt and the Presupposition Projection Problem,” Philosophical Perspectives 22, 171–205.

Geach, P.,  Reference and Generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Goldsmith, L.,  “Articles, Particles, Syntax,” Manuscript, Northwestern University, Dept. of Philosophy.

Grice, H.P., 1939. Negation.

 -- 1948. Meaning.

1961. “The Causal Theory of Perception,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary volume), 35: 121–52.

1969 Vacuous Names -- repr. (partially) in Ostertag, "Definite descriptions: a reader". MIT.

–––, 1975. “Logic and Conversation,” in J. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press.

–––, 1981. “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature,” in P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 183–198.

 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.

 1991. The conception of value: the Carus Lectures, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

2001. Aspects of reason: the John Locke lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

 ---- Definite descriptions in Russell and in the vernacular.

---- seminar at Cornell when K. S. Donnellan was teaching logic.

Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof, “Dynamic Predicate Logic,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39–100.

Hawthorne, J., and D. Manley,  The Reference Book, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heim, I.,  The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

–––, 1983. On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. WCCFL 2:114–125.

–––, 1990. “E-Type pronouns and Donkey Anaphora,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 13: 137–178.

–––, 1992. “Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs,” Journal of Semantics 9,183–221.

Hewson, J., . Article and Noun in English, The Hague : Mouton.

Higginbotham, J.,  “Indefiniteness and Predication,” in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of (In)definiteness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 43–70.

–––, “Contexts, Models, and Meaning: A Note on the Data of Semantics,” in R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–48.

Higginbotham, J., and R. May,  “Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing,” The Linguistic Review, 1: 51–79.

Hornsby, J., . “Proper Names: A Defense of Burge,” Philosophical Studies, 30: 227–234.

–––, 1977. “Singular Terms in Contexts of Propositional Attitude,” Mind, 86: 31–48.

Jackson, F., 1998. “Reference and Description Revisited,” in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 12: Language, Mind, and Ontology, Oxford: Blackwell, 201–218. [Preprint available online.]

Kadmon, N., 1990. “Uniqueness,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 13: 273–324.

Kamp, H., 1981. “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation,” in J. Groenendijk et al., (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Natural Language, Amsterdam Centre. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk et.al., (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information, Dordrecht: Foris, 1–43 (1984).

Kamp, H., and U. Reyle, 1993. From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kanazawa, M., 2001. “Singular Donkey Pronouns are Semantically Singular,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 383–403.

Karmiloff-Smith, A., 1979. A Functional Approach to Child Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keenan, E. and Y. Stavi, 1986. “A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 253–326.

Kim, J., 1970. “Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations,” in N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 199–215.

King, J., 1987. “Pronouns, Descriptions, and the Semantics of Discourse,” Philosophical Studies, 51: 341–62.

–––, 1988. “Are Indefinite Descriptions Ambiguous?” Philosophical Studies, 53: 417–440.

Kempson, R., 1975. Presupposition and The Delimitation of Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kratzer, A., 1995. “Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide scope indefinites”, in F. Hamm and A. von Stechow (eds.), proceedings of Recent Developments in the Theory of Natural Language, Universitäat Täubingen.

–––, 1989. “An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 12: 607–653.

Krifka, M., 1996. “Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predicates and Donkey Sentences,” in T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings of SALT VI, Ithaca: Cornell University.

Kripke, S., 1977. “Speaker Reference and Semantic Reference,” in French, Uehling, and Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 6–27.

–––, 1980. Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kroon, F., 1987. “Causal Descriptivism,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 65: 1–17.

–––, 1989. “Circles and Fixed Points in Description Theories of Reference,” Noûs, 23: 373–392.

Lappin, S., 1989. “Donkey Pronouns Unbound,” Theoretical Linguistics, 15: 263–286.

Larson, R., and G. Segal, 1995. Knowledge of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lasersohn, P., 1993. “Existence Presuppositions and Background Knowledge,” Journal of Semantics, 10: 112–122.

Larson, R., and G. Segal, 1995. Knowledge of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lepore, E., 2004. “An Abuse of Context in Semantics: The Case of Incomplete Definite Descriptions,” in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, D., 1975. “Adverbs of Quantification,” in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–15.

–––, 1979. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–359.

–––, 1984. “Putnam's Paradox,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62: 221–236.

Linsky, B., 1992. “The Logical Form of Descriptions” (Critical Notice of Stephen Neale's Descriptions), Dialogue, 31: 677–83.

–––, 2002. “Russell's Logical Form, LF, and Truth Conditions,” in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 391–408.

Loar, B., 1976. “The Semantics of Singular Terms,” Philosophical Studies, 30: 353–377.

Ludlow, P., 1994. “Conditionals, Events, and Unbound Pronouns,” Lingua e Stile, 29: 3–20.

–––, 1999. Semantics, Tense, and Time: an Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

–––, 2001. “Metaphysical Austerity and the Problems of Temporal and Modal Anaphora,” in J. Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 15: Metaphysics, Atascadero: Ridgeview Press.

–––, 2002a. “LF and Natural Logic.” In G. Preyer (ed.) Logical Form, Language and Ontology: On Contemporary Developments in the Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––, 2002b. “Externalism, Logical Form, and Linguistic Intentions,” in A. Barber (ed.), The Epistemology of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 132–168.

Ludlow, P., and S. Neale, 1991. “Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell,” Linguistics & Philosophy, 14(2): 171–202.

Ludlow, P. and G. Segal, 2004. “On a Unitary Semantical Analysis for Definite and Indefinite Descriptions,” in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lycan, W., 1984. “A Syntactically Motivated Theory of Conditionals,” in French, Euhling, and Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume IX, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Mandelbaum, D., 1994. Syntactic Conditions on Saturation, Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Faculty in Linguistics, CUNY Graduate Center.

Marcus, R., 1948. “Modality and Description,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 13: 31–37. Reprinted in Modalities: Philosophical Essays, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Meinong, A., 1904. “Über Gegenstandstheorie,” Translated as “The Theory of Objects,” in R. Chisholm, ed.,Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, New York: Free Press, 1960.

McDowell, J., 1977. “On the Sense and Reference of Proper Names,” Mind, 86: 159–185.

Neale, S., 1990. Descriptions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Books.

–––, 1993. “Term Limits,” Philosophical Perspectives, 7: 89–114.

–––, 2000a. “On a Milestone of Empiricism,” in P. Kotatko and A. Orenstein (eds.) Knowledge, Language and Logic: Questions for Quine, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 237–346.

–––, 2000b. “On Being Explicit: Comments on Stanley and Szabó, and on Bach,” Mind and Language15, 284–294.

–––, 2002. “Abbreviation, Scope, Ontology,” in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–53.

–––, 2004. “This, That and the Other,” in M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–182.

–––, 2005. “A Century Later,” Mind 114, 809–871.

Nelson, M., 2002. “Descriptivism Defended,” Noûs, 36(3): 408–35.

Parsons, C., 1982. “Intensional Logic in Extensional Language,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 47: 289–328.

Parsons, T., 1978. “Pronouns as Paraphrases,” Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

–––, 1980. Nonexistent Objects, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Prior, A. N., 1967. Past, Present and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recanati, F., 1986. “Contextual Dependence and Definite Descriptions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, 87, 57–73.

Reimer, M., 1992. “Incomplete Descriptions,” Erkenntnis, 37: 347–63.

–––, 1998a. “Quantification and Context,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 21: 95–115.

–––, 1998. “Donnellan's Distinction/Kripke's Test,” Analysis, 58: 89.

Roberts, C., 1998. “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards and Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics,” in J-H. Yoom and A. Kathol (eds.) OSU Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 49: Papers in Semantics, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.

–––, 2004. “Context in Dynamic Interpretation,” in L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 197–221.

van Rooy, J., 2001. “Exhaustivity in Dynamic Semantics: Referential and Descriptive Pronouns,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 621–657.

Reinhart, T. (1997). “Quantifier-Scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 20: 335–397.

Russell, B., 1905. “On Denoting,” Mind, 14: 479–493.

–––, 1910–11. “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society (New Series), 11: 108–128. Reprinted in Mysticism and Logic, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1917, and New York: Doubleday, 1957.

–––, 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.

–––, 1957. “Mr. Strawson on Referring,” Mind, 66: 385–89.

Salmon, N., 1982. “Assertion and Incomplete Descriptions,” Philosophical Studies, 42: 37–45.

–––, 1991. Frege's Puzzle, Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing.

Schoubye, A., 2009. “Descriptions, Truth Value Intuitions, and Questions,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 32: 583–617.

–––, 2011. “On Describing,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Philosophy, St. Andrews University.

Searle, J., 1958. “Proper Names,” Mind, 67: 166–173.

–––, 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sellars, W., 1954. “Presupposing,” Philosophical Review, 63: 197–215.

Sennet, A., 2002. “An Ambiguity Test for Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Studies, 111: 81–95.

Sharvy, Richard, 1980. “A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions,” The Philosophical Review, 89: 607–623.

Shiffer, S., 1978. “The Basis of Reference,” Erkenntnis, 13: 171–206.

Smiley, T.J., 1981. “The Theory of Descriptions,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 67: 331–337.

Smullyan, A., 1947. “Review of Quine's ‘The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic’,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12: 139–141.

–––, 1948. “Modality and Description,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 13: 483–545.

Soames, S., 1976. A Critical Examination of Frege's Theory of Presupposition and Contemporary Alternatives, Ph.D. thesis, MIT Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy.

–––, 1986. “Incomplete Definite Descriptions,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27: 349–375.

–––, 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––, 2003. “The Two-Dimensionalist Attempt to Revive Descriptivism,” Msc., Princeton University, Dept. of Philosophy.

–––, 2005. Reference and Description: The Case against Two-Dimensionalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sosa, D., 1996. Representing Thoughts and Language, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University Department of Philosophy.

–––, 2001. “Rigidity in the Scope of Russell's Theory,” Noûs, 35: 1–38.

Sperber, D., and D. Wilson, 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.

Stalnaker, R., 1978. “Assertion” in Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics (Volume 9), P. Cole (ed.), Academic Press.

–––, 1990. “Narrow Content” in C. A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The role of content in logic, language and mind, Stanford: CSLI, 131–146.

Stanley, J., 1997. “Names and Rigid Designation,” in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell Press, 555–585.

–––, 1997b. “Rigidity and Content,” in R. Heck (ed.), Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honor of Michael Dummett, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131–156.

–––, 2000. “Context and Logical Form,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 391–434.

–––, 2002. “Making it Articulated,” Mind and Language, 17: 149–68.

Stanley, J. and Z. Szabó, 2000. “On Quantifier Domain Restriction,” Mind and Language, 15: 219–61.

Stanley, J., and T. Williamson, 1995. “Quantifiers and Context-Dependence,” Analysis, 55: 291–5.

Strawson, P.F., 1950. “On Referring,” Mind, 59: 320–334.

–––, 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen.

–––, 1959. Individuals, London: Methuen.

–––, 1964. “Identifying Reference and Truth-Values,” Theoria, 3: 96–118.

--- work with H. P. Grice on "Categories" -- The Grice Papers.

-- with H. P. Grice, In defense of a dogma, repr. in Grice, W. O. W., Way of Words.

Szabó, Z., 2000. “Descriptions and Uniqueness,” Philosophical Studies, 101: 29–57.

Thomason, R., 1990. “Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics,” in P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 325–363.

Thornton, R., and K. Wexler, 1999. Principle B, VP Ellipsis and Interpretation in Child Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wettstein, H., 1981. “Demonstrative Reference and Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Studies, 40: 241–257.

Wexler, K., 2011. “Maximal Trouble in the Determiner System,” in E. Gibson and N. Perlmutter (eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 15–42.

Wiggins, D., 1965. “Identity Statements,” in R.J.Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, 2nd edition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Williams, E., 1983. “Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 6: 423–446.

Wilson, G., 1978. “On Definite and Indefinite Descriptions,” The Philosophical Review, 87: 48–76.

Wilson, N., 1959. “Substances without Substrata,” Review of Metaphysics, 12: 521–539.

Yablo, S., 2006. “Non-Catastrophic Presupposition Failure,” in J.J. Thomson and A. Byrne (eds.), Content and Modality: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–––, 2009. “Must Existence Questions Have Answers?” in D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 507–525.s

Yoon, Y., 1996. “Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations,” Natural Language Semantics, 4: 217–236.

Winter, Y., 1997. “Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites,” Linguistics and Philosophy, 20: 399–467. [Preprint available online.]

Zalta, E., 1983. Abstract Objects: an Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

–––, 1988. Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intensionality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zvolensky, Z., 1997. “Definite Descriptions: What Frege got Right and Russell Didn't,” Aporia, 7: 1–16.