From Dale's thesis, ch. 4, as I explore his symbolisms: lambda-function, g-function, which are elegant, and "delta".
Dale writes:
"Suppose, to take a single example, that there was a finite theory
Δ*
which entailed an analysis of the
'conventionally-expresses' relation employed in [D]."
"Then, the conjunction of [D] and
Δ*
will be a C[ompositional] S[ematic] T[heory] by my definition and it also entails an analysis of the semantic notion with which it is chiefly concerned."
--- cfr. Speranza on 'pushing up the daisies'.
Dale:
"Of course, all the "C[ompositional] S[ematic] T[heory] work", so to speak, of this CST is done by [D]."
"
Δ*
is just tacked on to [D]."
Later, I hope.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment