The Grice Club

Welcome

The Grice Club

The club for all those whose members have no (other) club.

Is Grice the greatest philosopher that ever lived?

Search This Blog

Monday, March 28, 2011

Chris Barker fails to cite from Grice -- but we love him

References to Barker's online study -- Grice added


Abramsky, Samson. 1993.

Computational interpretations of Linear Logic.
Theoretical Computer Science 111(1). 3{57.

Accorsi, Rafael & Johan van Benthem. 1999. Lorenzen's games and Linear
32 Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning
Logic. University of Amsterdam manuscript.
http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/ accorsi/papers/games.pdf.

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. Japanese modals are conditionals. In Diane Brentari,
Gary Larson & Lynn MacLeod (eds.). The joy of grammar: A festschrift
in honor of James D. McCawley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1{10.

Allwein, Gerard & J. Michael Dunn. 1993. Kripke models for Linear Logic.
The Journal of Symbolic Logic 58(2). 514{545. doi:10.2307/2275217.

Aloni, Maria. 2007. Free choice, modals, and imperatives. Natural Language
Semantics 15(1). 65{94. doi:10.1007/s11050-007-9010-2.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis. 2006. Disjunction in alternative semantics. UMass
Amherst: PhD dissertation.

Asher, Nicholas & Daniel Bonevac. 2005. Free choice permission is strong
permission. Synthese 145(3). 303-323. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-6196-z.
Brown, Mark. 1996. Doing as we ought: Towards a logic of simply dischargeable
obligations. In Mark Brown & Jos e Carmo (eds.). Deontic logic, agency
and normative systems (Third International Workshop on Deontic Logic
in Computer Science). Berlin: Springer. 47{65.
Chemla, Emmanuel. 2009a. Universal implicatures and free choice e ects: experimental
data. Semantics and Pragmatics 2(2). 1-33. doi:10.3765/sp.2.2.
Chemla, Emmanuel. 2009b. Similarity: Towards a uni ed account of scalar implicatures,
free choice permission and presupposition projection. Manuscript.
http://www.emmanuel.chemla.free.fr/Material/Chemla-SIandPres.pdf.
Clancy, Patricia M. 1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Dan Slobin (ed.).
The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data (Volume 1).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 373{524.
Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics
volume 34). New York: Academic Press.
Dekker, Paul. 2002. Meaning and use of inde nite expressions. Journal of Logic,
Language and Information 11(2). 141{194. doi:10.1023/A:1017575313451.
Franke, Michael. 2009. Free choice from iterated best response. In Maria
Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager, Peter van Ormondt & Katrin
Schulz (eds.). Pre-proceedings of the seventeenth Amsterdam Colloquium.
Amsterdam: ILLC/Department of Philosophy. 267{276.
Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicature.
In Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva (eds.). Presupposition and implicature
in compositional semantics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 71{120.
Geurts, Bart. 2005. Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals. Natural
Language Semantics 13(4). 383{410. doi:10.1007/s11050-005-2052-4.
Girard, J.-Y. 1987. Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science 50(1). 1{102.
33
Chris Barker
doi:10.1016/0304-3975(87)90045-4.

Girard, J.-Y. 1995. Linear Logic: its syntax and semantics. In J.-Y. Girard,
Y. Lafont and L. R egnier (eds.). Advances in Linear Logic. Lecture Note
Series 222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1{42.


Grice, H. P. Studies in the way of words. 1989. Account of assertive mode operator and imperative mode operator.

Grice, H. P. 1973, mimeo. Probability, desirability, and mode operators. Cited as from 1971 -- the Grice Papers.

Grice, H. P. The John Locke lectures on aspects of reason. Oxford: Clarendon. A study of satisfactoriness conditions for things like "Mail those letters, or burn them!".

---


Hansen, Jorg, Gabriella Pigozzi & Leendert van der Torre. 2007. Ten philosophical
problems in deontic logic. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 07122.
http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2007/941.
Kamp, Hans. 1973. Free choice permission. Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society 74. 57{74.
Kamp, Hans. 1978. Semantics versus pragmatics. In F. Guenthner &
S. J. Schmidt (eds.). Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural lan-
guages. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel. 255{287.
Klinedinst, Nathan. 2007. Plurality and possibility. UCLA, CA: PhD dissertation.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Arnim von Stechow, Dieter Wunderlich
(eds.). Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenossischen
Forschung. Berlin: De Gruyter. 639{650.
Kratzer, Angelika, and Shimoyama, J. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The
view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (ed.). The proceedings of the third Tokyo
conference on psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. 1{25.
Lokhorst, Gert-Jan C. 1997. Deontic linear logic with Petri net semantics.
Technical report, FICT (Center for the Philosophy of Information and
Communication Technology). Rotterdam.
http://homepages.ipact.nl/ lokhorst/deopetri.pdf.
Lokhorst, Gert-Jan C. 2006. Andersonian deontic logic, propositional quanti -
cation, and Mally. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47(3). 385{395.
doi:10.1305/ndj
/1163775445.
McNamara, Paul. 2006. Deontic Logic. In Dov M. Gabbay & John Woods
(eds.). Handbook of the history of logic, volume 7: Logic and the modalities
in the twentieth century. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 197-288. A version is
also available in the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-deontic/.
Moortgat, Michael. 1997. Categorial Type Logics. In Johan van Benthem &
Alice ter Meulen (eds.). Handbook of logic and language. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press. 93{177.
Portner, Paul. 2009a. Modality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Portner, Paul. 2009b. Permission and choice. Georgetown University:
Manuscript.
van Rooij, Robert. 2008. Towards a uniform analysis of any. Natural Language
34
Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning
Semantics 16(4). 297{315. doi:10.1007/s11050-008-9035-1.
van Rooij, Robert. 2010. Conjunctive interpretation of disjunction. Semantics
and Pragmatics.
Restall, Greg. 2000. An introduction to substructural logics. London: Routledge.
Ross, Alf. 1941. Imperatives and logic. Theoria 7(1). 53{71.
Schulz, Katrin. 2005. A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice
permission. Synthese 147(2). 343{377. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4631-6 10.
Shan, Chung-chieh. 2004. Binding alongside Hamblin alternatives calls for
variable-free semantics. In Kazuha Watanabe & Robert B. Young (eds.).
Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV. Cornell University
Press. 289{304.
Simons, Mandy. 2005. Dividing things up: the semantics of or and the
modal/or interaction. Natural Language Semantics 13(3). 271{316.
doi:10.1007/s11050-004-2900-7.
Wadler, Phil. 1993. A taste of Linear Logic. In Andrzej Borzyszkowski &
Stefan Sokolowski (eds.). Proceedings of the 18th international sympo-
sium on mathematical foundations of computer science (Lecture Notes
in Computer Science Volume 711). Heidelberg: Springer. 185-210.
doi:10.1007/3-540-57182-5 12.
Zimmermann, Ede. 2000. Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Nat-
ural Language Semantics 8(4). 255-290. doi:10.1023/A:1011255819284.

No comments:

Post a Comment