REFERENCES
Aloni, Maria.
2007.
Free choice, modals, and imperatives.
Natural Language Semantics 15: 65–94.
doi:10.1007/s11050-007-9010-2.
--- & Robert van Rooy. 2002. The dynamics of questions and focus. In B. Jackson (ed.)
Proceedings of SALT 12. CLC Publications. URL http://sta .science.uva.nl/~maloni/salt02/salt02.pdf.
Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2003.
Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1966.
Imperative inference. Analysis 26: 79–82. doi:10.2307/3326286.
Bratman, Michael E. 1987.
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Broome, John. 1999.
Normative requirements. Ratio 12: 398–419. doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00101.
Castaneda, Hector Neri. 1958. Imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis 19: 42–48. doi:10.2307/3326749.
Castaneda, Hector Neri. 1960. Imperative reasonings. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21:
21–49. doi:10.2307/2104787.
Castaneda, Hector Neri. 1971. There are command sh-inferences. Analysis 32: 13–19. doi:10.2307/3327276.
Charlow, N.
"Imperative semantics and dynamics."
Unpublished ms., University of Michigan.
----
"Imperatives in context."
Unpublished ms., University of Michigan.
Charlow, Simon. 2008c.
Free and bound pro-verbs: A unified treatment of anaphora. In T. Friedman &
S. Ito (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 18. CLC Publications. URL http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/
mI5YTEyO/.
Chellas, Brian F. 1980. Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fintel, Kai & Anthony S. Gillies. 2007. An opinionated guide to epistemic modality. In T. Gendler
& J. Hawthorne (eds.) Oxford Studies in Epistemology: Volume 2. Oxford University Press. URL
http://mit.edu/fintel/fintel-gillies-2007-ose2.pdf.
Fintel, Kai & Sabine Iatridou. 2008. What to do if you want to go to harlem: Anankastic conditionals
and related matters. URL http://mit.edu/fintel/www/harlem-rutgers.pdf. Unpublished ms., MIT.
Geach, P. T. 1958. Imperative and deontic logic. Analysis 18: 49–56. doi:10.2307/3326785.
----
1963. Imperative inference. Analysis 23, Supplement 1: 36–42. doi:10.2307/3326619.
---- 1966.
"Kenny on practical inference".
Analysis 26: 76–79. doi:10.2307/3326285.
Geurts, B.
Entertaining alternatives: Disjunctions as modals. Natural Language Semantics 14:
383–410. doi:10.1007/s11050-005-2052-4.
Gillies, Anthony S. 2007. Counterfactual scorekeeping. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 329–360.
doi:10.1007/s10988-007-9018-6.
Gillies, Anthony S. 2008. I ness. URL http://www-personal.umich.edu/~thony/i ness-revised-june2008.
pdf. Unpublished ms., University of Michigan.
Green, Mitchell. 1997. The logic of imperatives. In E. Craig (ed.) The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
717–721. New York: Routledge.
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
----- 2001. Aspects of reason. Satisfactoriness of "!p --> therefore !p or !q -- criticised by Harman as allowing "Mail those letters or burn them!".
------ Atlas cites from the also relevant, "Probability, desirability and mood operators".
----- Grice 1971, British Academy lecture, cites from Kenny on voliting.
----- Hare's source are:
------------- Grice, "Logic and conversation"
---------------------"The causal theory of perception" -- analysis of "or" -- omitted in the WoW reprint.
--------------------- "Logic and conversation", the Oxford lectures, 1966. First use of 'implicature'.
---
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1991. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14:
39–100. doi:10.1007/BF00628304.
Hamblin, Charles. 1987. Imperatives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hare, R. M. 1949. Imperative sentences. Mind 58: 21–39. doi:10.1093/mind/LVIII.229.21----The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
--- Some alleged di erences between imperatives and indicatives. Mind 76: 309–326.
doi:10.1093/mind/LXXVI.303.309.
------------- citing Grice explcitly.
Isaacs, James & Christopher Potts. 2003. Hidden imperatives. URL http://people.umass.edu/potts/talks/
isaacs-potts-nels34-handout-1up.pdf. Talk delivered at NELS 34, SUNY Stony Brook.
Jørgensen, Jørgen. 1937-8. Imperatives and logic. Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.
Kenny, A. J. 1966. Practical inference. Analysis 26: 65–75. doi:10.2307/3326284.
Kolodny, Niko & John MacFarlane. 2008. Ifs and oughts. URL http://johnmacfarlane.net/ifs-and-oughts.pdf.
Unpublished ms., UC Berkeley.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.) Words,
Worlds, and Contexts, 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Conditionals. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.) Semantics: An
International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 651–656. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: the view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu
(ed.) Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (TCP 2002), 1–25. Tokyo:
Hituzi Syobo.
Lemmon, E. J. 1965. Deontic logic and the logic of imperatives. Logique et Analyse 8: 39–71.
Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Malden: Basil Blackwell.
Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language,
3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mastop, Rosja. 2005. What can you do? Ph.D. Dissertation, ILLC.
Ninan, Dilip. 2005. Two puzzles about deontic necessity. In J. Gajewski, V.
Hacquard, B. Nickel & S. Yalcin
(eds.) New Work on Modality, Vol. 51 of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge: MITWPL.
Portner, Paul. 2004. The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In K. Watanabe &
R. Young (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 14. CLC Publications. URL http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/
mJlZGQ4N/.
Portner, Paul. 2008. Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15: 351–383.
doi:10.1007/s11050-007-9022-y.
Potts, Christopher. 2003.
Keeping world and will apart: A discourse-based semantics for imperatives. URL
http://people.umass.edu/potts/talks/potts-nyu-handout.pdf. Talk delivered at NYU Syntax/Semantics
Lecture Series.
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
doi:10.1007/BF02342617.
Ross, Alf. 1941. Imperatives and logic. Theoria 7: 53–71.
Schulz, Katrin. 2003. You may read it now or later: A case study on the paradox of free choice permission.
URL http://www.illc.uva.nl/Publications/ResearchReports/MoL-2004-01.text.pdf. M.A. Thesis,
University of Amsterdam.
Schulz, Katrin. 2005. A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice permission. Synthese 147:
343–377. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-1353-y.
Schwager, Magdalena. 2006. Conditionalized imperatives. In M. Gibson & J. Howell (eds.) Proceedings of
SALT 16. CLC Publications. URL http://user.uni-frankfurt.de/~scheiner/papers/schwagerFEB07.pdf.
Segerberg, Krister. 1990.
Validity and satisfaction in imperative logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
31: 203–221. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093635415.
Segerberg, Krister. 1994. A model existence theorem in infinitary propositional modal logic. Journal of
Philosophical Logic 23: 337–367. doi:10.1007/BF01048686.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York:
Academic Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721.
doi:10.1023/A:1020867916902.
Swanson, Eric. 2006. Interactions with context. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Swanson, Eric. 2008a. Constraint semantics and its application to conditionals. URL http://www-personal.
umich.edu/~ericsw/research/Swanson,%20Constraint%20Semantics%20handout.pdf. Talk delivered
82
imperative statics and dynamics 83
at First Formal Epistemology Festival, University of Konstanz.
Swanson, Eric. 2008b. Modality in language. Philosophy Compass 3: 1193–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1747-
9991.2008.00177.x.
Veltman, Frank. 1996. Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 221–261.
doi:10.1007/BF00248150.
Veltman, Frank. 2008.
Imperatives at the semantics/pragmatics interface. Unpublished ms., ILLC.
Vorobej, Mark. 1982. Deontic accessibility. Philosophical Studies 41: 317–319. doi:10.1007/BF00353882.
Williams, B. A. O. 1963. Imperative inference. Analysis 23, Supplement 1: 30–36. doi:10.2307/3326619.
Yalcin, Seth. 2007. Epistemic modals. Mind 116: 983–1026. doi:10.1093/mind/fzm983.
Zimmermann, Thomas Ede. 2000. Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language
Semantics 8: 255–90. doi:10.1023/A:1011255819284.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment