Free Choice Items and Alternatives
:
by Maria Aloni , Robert Van Rooij
"Extending the proposal made by Schulz (2003), we put forward a pragmatic account of the meaning of existential and universal Free-Choice items, where the ‘ignorance or indifference ’ inference triggered by the former and the ‘universal ’ inference triggered by the latter are treated as
a conversational implicature
obtained by standard
Griceian
reasoning formalized in terms of the two operations grice and competence."
"On this account, the
conversational implicature of a sentence is generated with respect to a number of relevant alternatives.
The difference between existential and universal Free Choices is due only to the choice of these alternatives. 1
Citations37
The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items, Linguistic Analysis – Krifka - 1995
30 Indefinite Pronouns – Haspelmath - 1997
26 2002) “Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese – Kratzer, Shimoyama
17 Any as inherently modal – Dayal - 1998
12 "Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility – Zimmermann - 2000
11 Logic and Conversation’, typescript from the William James Lectures – Grice - 1967
9 You May Read It Now or Later: A Case Study on the Paradox of Free Choice Permission – Schulz
7 On choice-offering imperatives – Aloni
6 2004), ‘Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences – Rooij
3 may read it now or later: A case study on the paradox of free choice permission – You
2 Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik – Autorenkollektiv - 1981
1 2003, Negative polarity items in questions: strength as relevance – Rooij
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment