H. P. Grice
“I count
myself wonderfully fortunate to have begun my studies as tutee of W. F. R.
Hardie, president of my alma mater, Corpus, the author of an essay on Plato
which both is and is recognised as a master-piece, whose explorations on the Nicomachean
Ethics, in one of their earlier incarnations, as a set of lecture notes, sees me
through terms of teaching Aristotle's moral theory.”
“It seems to
me that I learnt from Hardie just about all the things which one can be taught
by someone else, as distinct from the things which one has to teach oneself.”
“More
specifically, my initial rationalism is developed at Hardie’s tutorials into a
belief that a philosophical question is to be settled by a reason, that is to
say, by an argument.”
“I learnt
also from Hardie how to argue.”
“In learning
how to argue, I came to learn that the ability to argue is a skill involving
many aspects, and is much more than the
ability to see a logical connection (though this ability is, by no means, to be
despised).”
“From
Hardie, I came also to see that, though philosophical ‘progress’ is pretty difficult
to achieve, and is often achieved only after an agonising labour, it is worth achieving; and that the difficulty
involved in achieving philosophical ‘progress’ offers no kind of an excuse for
a lowering of standards, or for substituting for the goals of ‘philosophical
truth’ some more easily achievable or accessible goal, like rabble-rousing.”
“Hardie’s methods,
I grant, are too austere for some.”
“In particular,
Hardie’s long silences at tutorials are found somewhat distressing by some
tutees (though as the years went by, the tempo did speed up.”
“There is a
story, which I am not sure that I believe, that at one point in one of Hardie’s
tutorial, a very long silence developed when it is Hardie’s turn to speak,
which was at long last broken by Hardie with: ‘And what did you mean by ‘of’?’”
“Another
story, which I think I do believe, has a tutee of Hardie’s deciding that the
next time a silence develops in one of Hardie’s tutorials, the tutee is not going to be the one to break it.”
“In the next
tutorial, after the tutee finished reading his essay to Hardie, there follows a
silence which lasts twenty-five minutes, at which point the tutee can stand it
no longer, and says something.”
“Hardie’s tutorial
rigours never bother me.”
“If
philosophising is a difficult operation, as it plainly is, sometimes time, even
quite a lot of time, will be needed
in order to make a move, as chess-players are only too well aware.”
“The idea
that a philosopher either has already answered all questions, or is equipped to
answer any question immediately, is no less ridiculous than would be the idea
that Karpov ought to be able successfully to defend his title if he, though not
his opponent, were bound by the rules of lightning chess.”
“I like the
slow pace of discussion with Hardie.”
“I like the
breath-laden ‘Ooohhh!’ which Hardie sometimes emits when he catches his tutee
in, or even pushes him into, a patently untenable position (though I prefer it
when this ejaculation is directed at someone other than myself).”
“I also like
Hardie’s resourcefulness in the defence of what may be a difficult position, a
characteristic illustrated by the following incident which Hardie himself once
told me about himself.”
“Hardie had parked
his car and gone to a cinema.”
“Unfortunately,
Hardie had parked his car on top of one of the strips on the street by means of
which traffic-lights are, at the time, controlled by the passing traffic.”
“As a
result, the lights are jammed, and it requires four policemen to lift Hardie’s car
off the strip.”
“The police
decides to prosecute.”
“I indicated
to Hardie that this did not surprise me at all and asked him how he fared.”
“‘Oh,’
Hardie says, ‘I got off.’”
“I ask Hardie
how on earth he managed that.”
“‘Quite
simply,’ Hardie answers, ‘I just invoked Mill’s method of difference.’”
“‘The police
charged me with causing an obstruction at 4 p.m.’”
“‘I tell him
that, since my car was parked at 2 p.m.,
it could not have been my car which
caused the obstruction at 4 p.m.’”
“Hardie never discloses his views to his tutees,
no doubt wishing them to think their own thoughts (however flawed) rather than
his.”
“When a
tutee did succeed, usually with considerable difficulty, in eliciting from
Hardie an expression of his own position, what one got was liable to be, though
carefully worked out and ingeniously argued, distinctly conservative in tone.”
“Not
surprisingly, it would not contain much in the way of battle-cries or
campaign-material.”
“Aspiring
knights-errant require more than a sword, a shield, and a horse of superior
quality impregnated with a suitable admixture of magic.”
“They
require a supply, or at least a procedure which can be relied on to maximize
the likelihood of access to a supply, of damsels in distress.”
No comments:
Post a Comment