Dever's reference list on 'compositionality'

Since I discussed, or rather, copied and pasted, notably, Dever's two examples of anti-compositional sympathies:

"What the hell does Grice mean by 'mean'?"

and

"Many Griceans were Gricean".

----

I propose to review the reference list. After all, it was retrieved to me yet again by Google when I was googling on theory-compositional-theorem, etc.


References

[1]

Peter Aczel.

Lectures on Non-Well-Founded Sets. CSLI Lecture, 1987.

[2] Emmon Bach.

An extension of classical transformational grammar.

In Problems
in Linguistic Metatheory: Proceedings of the 1976 Conference. Michigan State
University Press, 1976.

[3] Ronnie Cann.

Formal Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press,
1993.

[4] Gregory Carlson.

Distribution of free choice ‘any’. Chicago Linguistic Society,
17:8–23, 1981.

[5] Gennaro Chierchia and Sally McConnell-Ginet.

Meaning and Grammar: An
Introduction to Semantics. The MIT Press, 1990.

[6] Ariel Cohen.

Think Generic:

The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences.

PhD
thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1996.
49

[7] Ariel Cohen.

Relative readings of many, often, and generics.

Natural Language
Semantics, 9:41–67, 2001.

[8] Mark Crimmins.

Hesperus and phosphorus: Sense, pretense, and reference.

The
Philosophical Review, 107:1–47, 1998.

-- with Dale and others, Schiffer credits Crimmins in the last footnote to his "Paradox of meaning" (online -- no references, though).

[9] H. de Swart.

Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach.

PhD thesis, Groningen University, 1991.

[10] Marcel den Dikken and Anastasia Giannakidou.

From hell to polarity:

“agressively non-d-linked” wh-phrases as polarity items.

Linguistic Inquiry, 33:31–61,
2001.

[11] Josh Dever.

Compositionality as methodology.

Linguistics and Philosophy,
22:311–326, 1999.

[12] Josh Dever.

Review of zoltan gendler szabo, problems of compositionality.

The
Philosophical Review, 112:254–2588, 2003.

[13] Michael Dummett.

Frege: Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press,
1973.

[14] Tim Fernando.

Ambiguity under changing contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy,
20:575–606, 1997.

[15] Tim Fernando.

Ambiguous discourse in a compositional context. Journal of
Logic, Language, and Information, 10:63–86, 2001.

[16] Jerry Fodor.

Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford University
Press, 1998.

[17] Jerry Fodor.

In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and
the Philosophy of Mind. The MIT Press, 1998.
50

[18] Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore.

Why meaning (probably) isn’t conceptual role.
Mind and Language, 6:328–342, 1991.

[19] Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore.

The pet fish and the red herring: Why concepts
aren’t prototypes.

Cognition, 58:243–276, 1996.

[20] Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore.

Why compositionality won’t go away:

Reflections on Horwich’s ‘deflationary’ theory. Ratio, 2001.

[21] Gottlob Frege.

Compound thoughts.

Mind, 72:1–17, 1963.

[22] Gottlob Frege.

The Foundations of Arithmetic. 1980.

[23] Gottlob Frege. Letter to Jourdain, Jan. 1914. In Michael Beaney, editor, The Frege Reader. Blackwell Publishers, 1997.

[24] Jeroen Groenendijk and Martin Stokhof.

Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics
and Philosophy, 14:39–100, 1991.

[25] Richard Heck.

Is compositionality a trivial requirement? 2003.

[26] Hermann Hendriks.

Studied Flexibility: Categories and Types in Syntax and
Semantics. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1993.

[27] James Higginbotham. Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program in semantics. In
Ernest Lepore, editor, Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy
of Donald Davidson. Blackwell, 1986.

[28] Jaako Hintikka and Gabriel Sandu. Game-theoretical semantics. In Handbook of
Logic and Language.

[29] Wilfrid Hodges. Compositional semantics for a game of imperfect information.
Journal of the IPGL, 5:539–563, 1997.

[30] Wilfrid Hodges.

Some strange quantifiers. In Structures in Logic and Computer

Science. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
51

[31] Wilfrid Hodges.

Compositionality is not the problem.

Logic and Logical Philosophy,
6:7–33, 1998.

[32] Wilfrid Hodges.

Formal features of compositionality.

Journal of Logic, Language,
and Information, 10:7–28, 2001.

[33] Paul Horwich.

Meaning.

Oxford University Press, 1998. [HORWICH was born in Cheshire, England. To explore].


[34] Pauline Jacobson.

Paycheck pronouns, bach-peters sentences, and variable-free
semantics.

Natural Language Semantics, 8:77–155, 2000.

[35] Theo Janssen.

Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar,

volume 19
of CWI Tracts. Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1986.

[36] Theo Janssen.

Compositionality.

In Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen,
editors, Handbook of Logic and Language. The MIT Press, 1997.

[37] Theo Janssen.

Frege, contextuality and compositionality.

Journal of Logic, Language,
and Information, 10:115–136, 2001.

[38] Hans Kamp.

A theory of truth and semantic representation.

In Jeroen Groenendijk,
Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, editors, Truth, Interpretation, and Information:
Selected Papers From the Third Amsterdam Colloquium. Foris, 1984.

[39] Hans Kamp and Barbara Partee.

Prototype theory and compositionality.

Cognition,
1995.

[40] David Kaplan.

Words.

Aristotelian Society Supplement, 64:93–119, 1990.

[41] Jerrold Katz.

Compositionality, idiomaticity, and lexical substitution.

In A
Festschrift for Morris Halle. Holt, Rinehart, and Wilson, 1973.

[42] Jerrold Katz and Paul Postal.

Semantic interpretation of idioms and sentences
containing them.

Quarterly Progress Report of the MIT Research Laboratory of
Electronics, 70:275–282, 1963.
52

[43] Ali Kazmi and Francis Jeffrey Pelletier.

Is compositionality formally vacuous?

Linguistics and Philosophy, 21:629–633, 1998.

[44] Jaegwon Kim.

Concepts of supervenience. In Jaegwon Kim, editor, Supervenience
and Mind. Cambridge University Press, 1983.

[45] Manfred Krifka.

The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic
Analysis, 25:209–257, 1995.

[46] Saul Kripke. A puzzle about belief. In Nathan Salmon and Scott Soames, editors,
Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford University Press, 1988.

--- Pierre belives that London (Londres) is nice -- as postcards go -- yet ugly.

[47] William Ladusaw.

Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations.

PhD thesis,
University of Texas at Austin, 1979.

[48] Robin Lakoff.

Some reasons why there can’t be any some-any rule. Language,
45, 1969.

[49] Richard Larson and Gabriel Segal.

Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to
Semantic Theory.

The MIT Press, 1995.

[50] Marcia Linebarger.

Negative polarity and grammatical representation.

Linguistics
and Philosophy, 10:325–387, 1987.

[51] Richard Montague. Universal grammar. Theoria, 36:373–398, 1970.

[52] Geoffrey Nunberg, Ivan Sag, and Thomas Wasow. Idioms. Language, 70:491–
538, 1994.

[53] Daniel Osheron and Edward Smith. Conceptual combination with prototype concepts.
In Readings in Cognitive Science. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1988.

[54] Francis Jeff Pelletier.

On an argument against semantic compositionality.

In Dag
Prawitz and Dag Westerstahl, editors, Logic and the Philosophy of Science in
Uppsala. Kluwer, 1994.
53

[55] Francis Jeffrey Pelletier. Semantic compositionality: Free algebras and the argument
from ambiguity.

In M. Faller, S. Kaufmann, and M. Pauly, editors, Proceedings
of Seventh CSLIWorkshop on Logic, Language, and Computation. CSLI
Publications, 1999.

[56] Francis Jeffrey Pelletier.

Did Frege believe Frege’s principle?

Journal of Logic,
Language, and Information, 10:87–114, 2001.

--- cfr. Speranza, "Was Grice Gricean?"

---

[57] Jaroslav Peregrin.

Is compositionality an empirical matter?

2003.

[58] David Pesetsky. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The Representation
of (In)definiteness. The MIT Press, 1987.

[59] Thomas Pynchon. Mason and Dixon. Henry Holt and Company, 1997.

[60] Nathan Salmon. Frege’s Puzzle. The MIT Press, 1986.

[61] Stephen Schiffer. Remnants of Meaning. The MIT Press, 1987.

[62] Edward Smith, Daniel Osherman, Lance Rips, and Margaret Keane. Combining
prototypes: A selective modification model. In Eric Margolis and Stephen
Laurence, editors, Concepts: Core Readings. The MIT Press, 1999.

[63] Zoltan Gendler Szabo. Compositionality as supervenience. Linguistics and Philosophy,
23:475–505.

[64] Zoltan Gendler Szabo. Problems of Compositionality. Garland Publishing, Inc.,
2000.

[65] Frank Veltman. Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic,
25:221–261, 1996.

[66] Kai von Fintel. Exceptive conditionals: The meaning of ‘unless’. NELS, 22:135–
148, 1991.
54
[67] Markus Werning. Compositionality, context, categories, and the indeterminacy
of translation. Erkenntnis, 60:145–178, 2004.

[68] Dag Westerstahl. Compositionality and ambiguity.

[69] Dag Westerstahl. Logical constants in quantifier languages. Linguistics and Philosophy,
8:387–413, 1985.

[70] Dag Westerstahl. On mathematical proofs of the vacuity of compositionality.
Linguistics and Philosophy, 21:635=643, 1998.

[71] Dag Westerstahl. Idioms and compositionality. 1999.

[72] Wlodek Zadrozny. From compositional to systematic sematics. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 17:329–342, 1994.