Kramer writes:
"[H]ow can you say she's a well-known lesbian if you don't allow folks to say that they know she's a lesbian? (cfr. She's a well-known lesbian but I don't know that she's a lesbian)."
----
It all started on April 6th, when Kramer quoted me,
"Judith Butler, a well-known lesbian"
and commented:
"in English-L, we would need to say
that she was well-known to be a lesbian."
-----
So let's check the scenario, because Kramer also wants to say that
"Y, a well-known X"
is 'appropriae,' only, in a context where (his comment on "A Not So Well Known Gricean"
"X [is]
"a well-known exemplar
of the most relevant thing
to the utterer's recipient or
addresse, at this stage of the conversation,
that X is well-known to be"
Y.
And he was objecting that, for all he knew, he (Kramer) was not such (a recipient, or addressee). But I wonder if I was having Kramer in mind, when I wrote what I wrote. I do have Kramer in mind 98% of the times I utter things (especially in this blog) but perhaps that was an exception. I suppose Kramer will not BUY the argument that, as Grice writes, "one's addressee is, sometimes, oneself".
"Surely," Kramer may object, you 'knew' or puported to 'know' that Butler was a lesbian, so why would you care with a prolixic definite description like that?"
----
So let's revise as to whether the sexual orientation (same-sex, as it happens) of Butler is relevant. She writes:
"In some societies, a lesbian is not regarded as a woman -- at all".
The point was also observed by Lourdes -- Madonna's daughter. "Some people don't regard me as a woman at all", he complained to her mother. "That's because you are a girl, Lou".
"But then -- you are not, and you tour with those stupid shows like "sweet and sticky and the 'girlie' show, so you confuse me."
"Should I confuse you less if I told you I were a lesbian?"
"Everybody knows that!"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment