"Rationality without reasons", Mind, vol. 117
""Ratinality without reasons" "challenges", Baker writes,
"the assumption that reasons are intrinsic
to rational action."
Why?
Well,
"a great many actions are
not best understood as ones in which the
agent acted for reasons — and yet they can be
understood as rational, and as open to rational criticism."
She goes on:
"The relative paucity of explicit reason-giving,
practical arguments in daily life presents
a general philosophical problem."
Why?
Well, because,
"it reflects the existence of a class of ways
in which reason can regulate action, which
goes far beyond producing reasons or
applying principles."
She goes on:
"Much practical reasoning takes the form of
what H. P. Grice called ‘thought-transitions’."
"These are neither in the form of standard
practical arguments, nor can they be so
reconstructed without distorting the ways
in which an agent thinks."
Examples:
"Some actions to which one is led by
a thought transition are rational,
namely when what Grice called
a ‘propension’ towards a given class of
actions"
i.e.
"a standing inclination to act in certain
ways —- would itself stand up to rational evaluation."
----
"Rationality without reasons"
"examines two bases for such endorsement,
one local and limited, and one much more
speculative, due to Grice himself."
----
Meanwhile, we await publication of "Reflections on morals"! Congrats, J. Baker.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment