Before Gregor of Rimini lectured on the Sentences at Paris in 1344, the objections to the actual
infinite formulated by Fitzralph resulted in a rejection of both the potential and the actual
infinite.
In his argumentation, Fitzralphspeaks about the simultaneous infinite (simultanes infinitum).
In his discussion of the problem of infinity (during the 14th century) Henry of Harclay contemplated the difference between what he labeled the infinitum successivum and
infinitum simultaneum (cf. Maier, 1964:77-79).
These designations make and appeal to our
most basic intuitions of number (succession) and space (at once).
Therefore, it is
recommendable rather to distinguish between the successive infinite and the at once infinite
than between the potential infinite and the actual infinite.
No comments:
Post a Comment