By JLS
for the GC
As R. O. Doyle, entanglement and nonlocality can be problematic in QT.
It strikes me as anti-Strawsonian, nonlocality. But then... For Strawson, as with Aristotle, an individual is a spatio-temporal continuant. So I love that shade of nonlocality about stuff.
Entanglements I know of. Short/Lewis have an entry, "implicatura", used way
back by Sidonius. For lack of a better term, they translate it as
"entanglement"!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment