"Derrida also ignores Austin's contemporary H. P. Grice and his attention to the possibility of "sneaky intentions" and the impossibility of interpreting..."
From:
Michael J. Golec
“The Thinking Man’s Filter”: J. L. Austin’s Ordinary Language Philosophy as Cultural Criticism
Cultural Critique - 72, Spring 2009, pp. 66-88
University of Minnesota Press
Project MUSE - Cultural Critique - "The Thinking Man's Filter": J. L. Austin's Ordinary Language Philosophy as Cultural Criticism Project MUSE Journals Cultural Critique 72, Spring 2009 "The Thinking Man's Filter": J. L. Austin's Ordinary Language Philosophy as Cultural Criticism Cultural Critique 72, Spring 2009 E-ISSN: 1534-5203 Print ISSN: 0882-4371 DOI: 10.1353/cul.0.0039 "The Thinking Man's Filter"J. L. Austin's Ordinary Language Philosophy as Cultural Criticism Michael J. Golec In his hands, philosophy seemed at once more serious, and more fun. --G. J. Warnock, John Langshaw Austin Cultural Appropriation G. J. Warnock's assessment of the British philosopher J. L. Austin's contribution to philosophy -- both fun and serious -- directly precedes his too brief account of Austin's appreciation of America. The proximity of these two accounts in Warnock's biographical "sketch" suggests that Austin's special brand of philosophy and the welcoming ambience of the United States are related. Warnock's account is "too brief" because Austin's relationship to the United States and its culture has been too little studied, if at all. Certainly, there are the recollections of his American students who recall Austin's impact on their studies and future careers. To date, the American philosopher Stanley Cavell has been the most vocal in his indebtedness to Austin's contribution to his own "voice" in philosophy."
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment