H. P. Grice: Conversational Implicata and the Square of Opposition

1. 1.
   J.R.B. Arenhart, Liberating paraconsistency from contradiction. Log. Univers. 9, 523–544 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. 2.
   C. Benzmüller, B.W. Paleo, The ontological modal collapse as a collapse of the square of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
3. 3.
   J.-Y. Beziau (ed.), Special issue of Logica Universalis dedicated to the hexagon of opposition. Log. Univers. 6 (1–2) (2012)Google Scholar
4. 4.
   J.-Y. Beziau, Logical autobiography 50, in The Road to Universal Logic: Festschrift for the 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau, vol. II, ed. by A. Koslow, A. Buchsbaum (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2015), pp. 19–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. 5.
   J.-Y. Beziau, Round squares are no contradictions, in New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, M. Chakraborty, S. Dutta (Springer, New Delhi, 2015), pp. 39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. 6.
   J.-Y. Beziau, Disentangling contradiction from contrariety via incompatibility. Log. Univers. 10, 157–171 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. 7.
   J.-Y. Beziau, There is no cube of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
8. 8.
   J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (eds.), The Square of Opposition, A Cornerstone of Thought (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016)Google Scholar
9. 9.
   J.-Y. Beziau, S. Gerogiorgakis (eds.), New Dimension of the Square of Opposition (Philosophia, Munich, 2016)Google Scholar
10. 10.
    J.-Y. Beziau, R. Giovagnoli (eds.), Special Issue on the square of opposition. Log. Univers. 10 (2–3) (2016)Google Scholar
11. 11.
    J.-Y. Beziau, D. Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2012)Google Scholar
12. 12.
    J.-Y. Beziau, G. Payette (eds.), Special Issue on the square of opposition. Log. Univers. 2 (1) (2008)Google Scholar
13. 13.
    J.-Y. Beziau, G. Payette (eds.), The Square of Opposition - A General Framework for Cognition (Peter Lang, Bern, 2012)Google Scholar
14. 14.
    J.-Y. Beziau, S. Read (eds.), Special issue of History and Philosophy of Logic on the square of opposition. 35 (2014)Google Scholar
15. 15.
    A. Bobenrieth, The many faces of inconsistency, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
16. 16.
    W. Carnielli, Groups, not squares: exorcizing a fetish, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
17. 17.
    F. Cavaliere, Iconic and dynamic models to represent “distinctive” predicates: the octagonal prism and the complex tetrahedron of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
18. 18.
    M. Correia, The proto-exposition of Aristotelian categorical logic, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
19. 19.
    E. dal Covolo, Welcome address to the participants of the IV international congress on: the square of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
20. 20.
    A. Drago, From Aristotle’s square of opposition to the “tri-unity’s concordance: Cusanus non-classical arguing”, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
21. 21.
    S.B. Fink, Why care beyond the square? Classical and extended shapes of oppositions in their application to “introspective disputes”, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
22. 22.
    J.D. García-Cruz, From the square to octahedra, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
23. 23.
    R. Giovagnoli, P. Larrey, Aristotle, frege and “second nature”, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
24. 24.
    S. Johnstone, The modal octagon and John Buridan’s modal ontology, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
25. 25.
    B. Kumova, Symmetric properties of the syllogistic system inherited from the square of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
26. 26.
    F. Lepage, A square of oppositions in intuitionistic logic with strong negation. Log. Univers., 10, 327–338 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. 27.
    G.-J. Lokhorst, Fuzzy Eubouliatic logic: A fuzzy version of Anderson’s logic of prudence, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
28. 28.
    P. Murinová, V. Novák, Syllogisms and 5-Square of opposition with intermediate quantifiers in fuzzy natural logic. Log. Univers. 10, 339–358 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. 29.
    J. Piaget, L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires, in L’interdisciplinarité: Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche, Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement, ed. by L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, G. Michaud (Organisation de Coopération et de développement économique, Paris, 1972)Google Scholar
30. 30.
    J. Raclavský, Two standard and two modal squares of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
31. 31.
    S. Robert, J. Brisson, The Klein group, squares of opposition and the explanation of fallacies in reasoning. Log. Univers., 10, 377–392 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. 32.
    F. Schang, An arithmetization of logical oppositions, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
33. 33.
    H. Smessaert, L. Demey, The unreasonable effectiveness of bitstrings in logical geometry, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
34. 34.
    J. Vidal-Rosset, The exact intuitionistic meaning of the square of opposition, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar
35. 35.
    P. Weingartner, The square of opposition interpreted with a decidable modal logic, in The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought, ed. by J.-Y. Beziau, G. Basti (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9Google Scholar