Grice's Modified Occam's Razor

Speranza

• Aquinas, T., [BW], Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, A.C. Pegis (trans.), New York: Random House, 1945.
• Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, R. McKeon (trans.), New York: Random House, 1941.
• Audi, R. (ed.), 1995, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Baker, A., 2001, “Mathematics, Indispensability and Scientific Practice,” Erkenntnis, 55: 85–116.
• –––, 2003, “Quantitative Parsimony and Explanation,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54: 245–259.
• –––, 2007, “Occam's Razor in Science: a Case Study from Biogeography,” Biology and Philosophy, 22: 193–215.
• Barnes, E., 2000, “Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle”, Erkenntnis, 53: 353–74.
• Baron, S. & Tallant, J., forthcoming, “Do Not Revise Ockham's Razor Without Necessity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
• Bilaniuk, O.-M. & Sudarshan, E. (1969) “Particles Beyond the Light Barrier,” Physics Today, 22: 43–52.
• Bunge, M., 1963, The Myth of Simplicity: Problems in Scientific Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Burgess, J., 1998, “Occam's Razor and Scientific Method,” in Schirn (ed.) (1998), 195–214.
• Cameron, R., 2010, “How to Have a Radically Minimal Ontology,” Philosophical Studies, 151: 249–64.
• Derkse, W., 1992, On Simplicity and Elegance, Delft: Eburon.
• Dirac, P., 1930, “The Proton,” Nature, London, 126: 606.
• Fetzer, J. (ed.), 1984, Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
• Fichman, M., 1977, “Wallace: Zoogeography and the Problem of Land Bridges,” Journal for the History of Biology, 10(1): 45–63.
• Fitzpatrick, S., 2013, “Kelly on Ockham's Razor and Truth-Finding Efficiency,” Philosophy of Science, 80: 298–309.
• Ford, K., 1963, “Magnetic Monopoles,” Scientific American, 209: 122–31.
• Forster, M., 1995, “The Curve-Fitting Problem,” in Audi (ed.) (1995).
• –––, 2001, “The New Science of Simplicity,” in Zellner et al. (eds.) (2001), 83–119.
• Forster, M. & Sober, E., 1994, “How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 1–35.
• Friedman, M., 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Galileo, G., 1632, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, S. Drake (trans.), Berkeley, 1962.
• Gauch, H., 2003, Scientific Method in Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Goodman, N., 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Goodman, N. & Quine, W., 1947, “Steps Towards a Reconstructive Nominalism,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12: 105–122.
• Groarke, L., 1992, “Following in the Footsteps of Aristotle: the Chicago School, the Glue-stick and the Razor,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 6(3): 190–205.
• Holsinger, K., 1981, “Comment: the Blunting of Occam's Razor,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59: 144–6.
• Jansson, L. & Tallant, J., forthcoming, “Quantitative Parsimony: Probably for the Better,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
• Jeffreys, H., 1961, Theory of Probability, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Kant, I., 1781/1787, The Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith (trans.), New York: Humanities Press, 1950.
• Kelly, K., 2004, “Justification and Truth-Finding Efficiency: How Ockham's Razor Works,” Minds and Machines, 14: 485–505.
• –––, 2007, “A New Solution to the Puzzle of Simplicity,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 561–73.
• Kemeny, J., 1959, A Philosopher Looks at Science, New York: Van Nostrand.
• Kragh, H., 1981, “The Concept of the Monopole: a Historical and Analytical Case-Study,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 12(2): 141–72.
• Kuhn, T., 1977, “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice,” in The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 320–39.
• Lange, M., 1995, “Spearman's Principle,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46: 503–52.
• Lavoisier, A., 1862, “Réflexions sur le Phlogistique,” in Oeuvres (Volume 2), 623–4, Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.
• Lewis, D., 1973, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Maurer, A., 1984, “Ockham's Razor and Chatton's Anti-Razor,” Mediaeval Studies, 46: 463-75.
• McAllister, J., 2007, “Model Selection and the Multiplicity of Patterns of Empirical Data,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 884–894.
• Mendel, Gregor, 1865, Experiments in Plant Hybridisation, J. Bennett (ed.), R.A. Fisher (trans.), London: Oliver & Boyd, 1965.
• Nash, L., 1963, The Nature of the Natural Sciences, Boston: Little, Brown.
• Nelson, G., 1978, “From Candolle to Croizat: Comments on the History of Biogeography,” Journal of the History of Biology, 11(2): 269–305.
• Newton, I., 1687, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (Principia Mathematica), New York: Citadel Press, 1964.
• Nolan, D., 1997, “Quantitative Parsimony”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48: 329–43.
• –––, 1999, “Is Fertility Virtuous in its Own Right?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50: 265–82.
• Plutynski, A., 2005, “Parsimony and the Fisher-Wright Debate,” Biology and Philosophy, 20: 697–713.
• Popper, K., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
• Quine, W.V.O., 1966, “On Simple Theories of a Complex World”, in The Ways of Paradox, New York: Random House.
• –––, 1981, Theories and Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Rescher, N., 1998, Complexity: a Philosophical Overview, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
• Riesch, H., 2010, “Simple or Simplistic? Scientists' Views on Occam's Razor,” Theoria, 67: 75–90.
• Sarkar, S. & Pfeifer, J. (eds.), 2006, The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, London: Routledge.
• Schaffer, J., 2010, “Monism: The Priority of the Whole,” Philosophical Review, 119: 37–76.
• –––, 2015, “What to Not Multiply Without Necessity,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93: 644–64.
• Schirn, M. (ed.), 1998, The Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.
• Schlesinger, G., 1963, Method in the Physical Sciences, London: Routledge.
• Schulte, O., 1999, “Means-End Epistemology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50: 1–31.
• –––, 2008, “The Co-discovery of Conservation Laws and Particle Families,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 288–314.
• Sider, T., 2013, “Against Parthood,” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8: 237–93.
• Smart, J.J.C., 1984, “Ockham's Razor,” in Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, ed. Fetzer, 118–28.
• Sober, E., 1981, “The Principle of Parsimony,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32: 145–56.
• –––, 1988, Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• –––, 1994, “Let's Razor Ockham's Razor”, in From A Biological Point of View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–57.
• –––, 2001, “What is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner et al. (eds.) (2001), 13–31.
• –––, 2006, “Parsimony,” in Sarkar & Pfeifer (eds.) 2006 (Volume 2), pp. 531–538.
• –––, 2015, Ockham's Razors: A User's Manual, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Steel, D., 2009, “Testability and Ockham's Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38: 471–489.
• Swinburne, R., 1997, Simplicity as Evidence for Truth, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
• Thornburn, W., 1918, “The Myth of Occam's Razor,” Mind, 27: 345–53.
• Vitányi, L. & Li, M., 2001, “Simplicity, Information, Kolmogorov Complexity and Prediction,” in Zellner et al. (eds.) (2001), 135–55.
• Walsh, D., 1979, “Occam's Razor: A Principle of Intellectual Elegance”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16: 241–4.
• Woodward, J., 2003, Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Zellner, A., Keuzenkamp, H. & McAleer, M. (eds.), 2001, Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.