THE HERBERT PAUL GRICE COLLECTION, BANC MSS 90/135c -- A NAME INDEX

Speranza

Anon. (1999).

Criminal Law. Perjury. Sixth Circuit sustains perjury conviction for answer to question with mistaken premise. United States v. DeZarn, 157 F.3d 1042 (6th Cir. 1998). Harvard Law Review, 112(7), 1783–1788.

Atlas, J. D. The implications of conversation: The Leuven lectures. Ms.
--- J. D. Atlas studied at Wolfson. He quotes extensively from Grice.

Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bezuidenhout, A. (2002). Generalized conversational implicatures and default pragmatic inferences. In J. K. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, and D. Shier (Eds.), Meaning and truth: Investigations in philosophical semantics (pp.257–283). New York, NY: Seven Bridges Press. Bezuidenhout, A. L. and Morris, R. K. (2004). Implicature, relevance and default pragmatic inference. In I. A. Noveck and D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp.257–282). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Bott, L. and Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 437–457. Breheny, R., Katsos, N., and Williams, J. (2006). Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100, 434–463. Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973). Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carroll, L. (2009). Alice’s adventures in Wonderland and Through the lookingglass and what Alice found there. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp.179–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 199 Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Carston, R. (2004a). Explicature and semantics. In S. Davis and B. Gillon (Eds.), Semantics: A reader (pp.817–845). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carston, R. (2004b). Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp.633–656). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Carston, R. and Hall, A. (2012). Implicature and explicature. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp.47–84). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Castleman, D. (2004). Has the law made liars of us all? bepress Legal Series, Working paper 380. Retrieved from http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/380 Cummings, L. (2009). Clinical pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis, W. A. (1998). Implicature: Intention, convention, and principle in the failure of Gricean theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis, W. A. (2007). How normative is implicature. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1655–1672. Davis, W. A. (2014). Implicature. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/implicature/ Dennett, D. C. (1986). Content and consciousness (2nd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6, 353–375. Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., and Handley, S. J. (2004). The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 121–132. Frankish, K. (2004). Mind and supermind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 200 Frankish, K. and Kasmirli, M. (2010). Saying one thing and meaning another: A dual process approach to conversational implicature. In K. Manktelow, D. Over, and S. Elqayam (Eds.), The science of reason: A festschrift for Jonathan St. B. T. Evans (pp.259–281). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press. Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York, NY: Academic Press. Green, M. S. (2002). Review of “Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory” by Wayne A. Davis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 241–244. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388. Grice, H. P. (1961). The causal theory of perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. vol., 121–153. Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. Foundations of Language, 4(3), 225–242. Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intentions. The Philosophical Review, 78(2), 147–177. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp.41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp.113–127). New York, NY: Academic Press. Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp.183–198). New York, NY: Academic Press. Grice, H. P. (1982), Meaning revisited. In N. V. Smith (Ed.), Mutual knowledge (pp.223–243). New York, NY: Academic Press. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Grice, H. P. (2001). Aspects of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 201 Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., and Meroni, L. (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 667–696. Hall, A. (2008). Free enrichment or hidden indexicals? Mind & Language, 23(4), 426–456. Harnish, R. M. (1991). Logical form and implicature. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp.316–364). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Hirschberg, J. B. (1985). A theory of scalar implicature. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/w14/implicature/readings/hirs chberg85.pdf (Reprinted by Garland Publishing, 1991.) Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. University of California, LA. Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp.11–42). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Horn, L. R. (2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp.3–28). Oxford: Blackwell. Huang, Y. T. and Snedeker, J. (2009). Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: Evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1723–1739. Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 202 Martinich, A. P. (1991). A theory for metaphor. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp.507–518). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Morgan, J. L. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp.261–280). New York, NY: Academic Press. Neale, S. (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(5), 509–559. Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78(2), 165–188. Noveck, I. A. and Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85(2), 203–210. Noveck, I. A. and Reboul, A. (2008). Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 425–431. Noveck, I. A. and Sperber, D. (Eds.) (2004). Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Noveck, I. and Sperber, D. (2012). The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of “scalar inferences.” In D. Wilson and D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance (pp.307–330). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253–282. Papafragou, A. and Tantalou, N. (2004). Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 71–82. Peters, P. (2004). The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I. A., Politzer, G., and Bastide, A. (2007). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition, 14(4), 347–375. 203 Recanati, F. (1989). The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language, 4(4), 295–329. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Blackwell. Recanati, F. (2002). Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(3), 299–345. Sadock, J. M. (1991). On testing for conversational implicature. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp.365–376). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Salmon, N. (1989). Illogical belief. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 3, Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory, 243–285. Saul, J. M. (2001). Critical studies: Wayne A. Davis, Conversational implicature: Intention and convention in the failure of Gricean theory. Noûs, 35(4), 630– 641. Saul, J. M. (2002a). Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Noûs, 36(2), 228–248. Saul, J. M. (2002b). What is said and psychological reality; Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(3), 347–372. Saul, J. (2010). Speaker-meaning, conversational implicature and calculability. In K. Petrus (Ed.), Meaning and analysis: New essays on Grice (pp.170–183). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp.59–82). New York, NY: Academic Press. Soames, S. (2009). Philosophical essays, volume 1: Natural language: What it means and how we use it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Stanley, J. (2000). Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 391– 434. 204 Sterelny, K. (1982). Against conversational implicature. Journal of Semantics, 1(2), Stiller, A., Goodman, N. D., and Frank, M. C. (2011). Ad-hoc scalar implicature in adults and children. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA. Tiersma, P. M. (1989-1990). The language of perjury: Literal truth, ambiguity, and the false statement requirement. Southern California Law Review, 63, 373– 432. Turner, K. (2001). Review of Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, convention, and principle in the failure of Gricean theory. Journal of Linguistics, 37(2), 451–462. United States v. Bronston 453 F.2d 555 (2nd Cir. 1971). Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 145–178. Wierzbicka, A. (1987). Boys will be boys: “Radical semantics” vs. “radical pragmatics”. Language, 63, 95–114. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1991). Inference and implicature. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp.377–393). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111(443), 583–632. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp.607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.