The Grice Club

Welcome

The Grice Club

The club for all those whose members have no (other) club.

Is Grice the greatest philosopher that ever lived?

Search This Blog

Monday, February 20, 2012

The Grice Point

Speranza

I was nicely surprised to read that Peter Winch, the revered London philosopher (hisself a reverer of Witters) quotes Grice -- in a Royal Philosophical Society thing.

Winch makes a distinction, which he credits to Grice between

the _meaning_ of a remark

and the

_point_ of the remark.

It is TOO easy to go the whole hog and identify this _point_ with the relevance, but we know that Grice minimised relevance, which he only saw as one of the four categories in his amusing attempt to echo Kant: qualitas, quantitas, relatio, modus.

Consider,

"It looks to me as a red pillar box".

The _meaning_ may be something like:

_That pillar box seems red to me_.

compared to:

That pillar box is red to me.

The _point_ of the remark is what Grice calls the D-or-D implicature: "the red pillar box is NOT red, or I doubt it is."

And so on.

Grice will go on to apply the

meaning/point

distinction when, years later,

he considers:

"He likes it because he likes it."

In symbols:

p
---
therefore, p.

Grice wants to argue that that is a piece of reasoning. "Trivial, if you mustn't".

In

"He reasoned from p to p", again, we seem to have a clear meaning, since

p
---
therefore p

is valid in ALL logical accounts.

Yet, the _point_ of such a triviality is more difficult to grasp. But other than Winch, who cares?

No comments:

Post a Comment