Excerpts from a the NYT review of "The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented
Science"
"Leroi is a scientist, and Aristotle is his hero."
"This conjunction is interesting because, in the official telling of modern
science’s origins, Aristotle is hardly regarded as heroic."
"Instead he’s portrayed as the obstacle over which the early heroes of the
scientific revolution — Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo — had to leap in order to
impose a genuinely explanatory methodology over the often deceptive input of
sense perception."
"After all, what could be clearer to the senses than that the Earth is
stationary and the heavens revolve around it?"
"If there was any ancient whom these pioneers of modern science esteemed it
was PLATO."
"PLATO, too, had emphasized the deceptiveness of appearances."
"What’s more he had suggested, however obliquely, most especially in his
“Timaeus,” that mathematics reveals the true structure of the cosmos, offering
us the means by which we can distinguish between reliable and unreliable
appearances."
"So, at least, did men like Galileo read the “Timaeus,” finding
insights there to topple the formidable edifice of a Church-fortified
Aristotelianism."
"The new scientists discarded at least two of the four
Aristotelian causes, the formal and the final, the latter having injected a
pernicious teleology into all physical explanations."
"Flames leap and rocks fall
because their constituent elements are striving to get to their right places."
"In place of Aristotle’s qualitative categories, the new scientists put
quantitative descriptions of matter in motion."
"What Aristotle had sundered, the
celestial and the terrestrial, were united under one mechanics."
"And the rest, as
they say, is history."
"But this is the history of science as told from the vantage point of physics and cosmology."
"Leroi is a BIOLOGIST, and he tells the
story of science differently."
"He cannot mention Plato without hissing, often
characterizing him as anti-scientific or, at the very best, a poor scientist."
Leroi writes:
“Plato’s science is barely distinguishable from theology.”
"Instead Leroi’s heart
belongs to Aristotle, who not only was, like him, an enthusiastic student of
biology, particularly of zoology, but who also, unlike Plato, was besotted by
the world of appearances."
"Aristotle
exemplifies one kind of scientific aptitude."
"He was an enthralled observer of
the natural world, bedazzled by data, seeking causal explanations not in
abstract numbers but in concrete details acquired through avid sense
perception."
"The lagoon of Leroi’s title is on the Aegean island of Lesbos."
"Assos, on the coast of what is now Turkey,
faced Lesbos, and it was in Assos that Aristotle lived between his two Athenian
residencies, the first as a student and then teacher at Plato’s Academy, the
second as head of his own school, the Lyceum."
"Leroi accepts the conclusion of
the biologist D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson, who, in 1910, published a translation
of Aristotle’s “Historia Animalium,” that it was primarily beside the
life-teeming lagoon of Lesbos where Aristotle slaked his thirst for biological
observations."
"This is why so many of the animals of Aristotle’s prose live in or
near the sea."
"Given Leroi’s own impassioned empiricism, he must see it all with
his own eyes, and so this book, partly a travelogue, treats us to vivid
descriptions of fauna and flora, a lyricism arising from the density of the
details and the delight taken in them."
"Leroi says that Aristotle’s writing is a
“naturalist’s joy”"
"Plato and Aristotle: What an accident of history that two such contrasting
orientations toward the physical world, animated by two such different aesthetic
sensibilities, should have been pedagogically entangled with each other."
"One
espies beauty in the elegance of the mathematical proportions he is certain
rules the cosmos, the other in the richness of sensed particularities he is
certain can be functionally explained."
"Both orientations would find application
in the developed sciences to come, though neither Plato nor Aristotle was a
“finished” scientist."
"Something methodologically original occurred during the
observing, theorizing, experimenting activity of the scientific revolution."
"Neither Plato nor Aristotle had mastered the concept of experiment."
"To read
some semblance of our science into these ancients requires charitably
imaginative interpretations that clarify their obscurities with insights toward
which they were themselves, perhaps, groping."
"Some of us are prepared to extend
such interpretations toward Plato."
"Leroi extends them toward Aristotle, so much
so that he would vehemently reject my statement that Aristotle, like Plato, was
not the finished scientific article."
“As I contemplate the elaborate tapestry of
his science, and compare it to ours, I conclude that we can now see his
intentions and accomplishment more clearly than any previous age has seen them
and that, if this is so, it is because we have caught up with him.”
"This seems an extravagant claim, and, to justify it, Leroi energetically exhumes those moldering Aristotelian categories that the scientific revolution had supposedly buried and breathes the advances of modern biology into them."
"He
performs the resuscitation with dexterity, though he’s not the first."
"The great
evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr, for example, urged, in his “Toward a New
Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist,” that it is “quite
legitimate to employ modern terms like ‘genetic program’ for ‘eidos’ where this
helps to elucidate Aristotle’s thoughts.”
"Mayr acknowledged, however, that
Aristotle’s notion of fixed species is inconsistent with biology’s most
important advance, the theory of evolution."
"Leroi follows closely in the footsteps of such generous elucidators."
"The modern understanding of genetically
encoded information is applied not only to Aristotle’s formal cause, his
“eidos,” and to his notion that all change is potentiality actualized, but also
to his notion of the soul."
"“Aristotle’s belief that we should attend less to the
matter than to the informational structure of living things makes him seem like
a molecular geneticist avant la lettre.”"
"And as far as that pernicious teleology
of which Aristotle stands accused, Leroi asserts that it provides the very
justification for proclaiming Aristotle the inventor of science."
"“He’s a
comparative biologist; his real interest is specific teleology."
"Aristolte wants to know
not only why this animal has that feature, but also why others haven’t."
"To
answer this question, and the countless others like it, prompted by all the
parts of all the animals in all the world, he devised a system of teleological
principles and precepts."
"It’s the core of a system that has been used ever
since.”
"Leroi holds off admitting until late in the book that the charge he
had leveled against Plato — that his science seems inseparable from theology —
holds for Aristotle, too."
"“I have kept Aristotle’s theos in the shadows. It may
even be that I have done so deliberately; that I have been reluctant to reveal
the degree to which my hero’s scientific system is riddled with religion. Yet it
is.”"
We admire Leroi for striving to naturalize Aristotle’s system in the light
of modern biology.
"Aristotle has gotten a raw
deal in the official scientific story."
"But Aristotle can’t be entirely naturalized."
"Just don’t trust
anything he says about Plato."
"There is a diversity of talents and passions that
contribute to the advance of science, and it isn’t necessary, in doing justice
to some subset of these, to denigrate the others."
THE LAGOON
How Aristotle Invented Science
By Armand Marie Leroi
No comments:
Post a Comment