It is quite a task to trace our "Roman Grice"; and I don't mean our "Greek Grice" (as Horn calls him).
By "Roman Grice" I mean the earliest rhetorical references in 'oratory', rather, which have a Griceian tone to them.
The earliest treatise, wrongly ascribed for YEARS to CICERONE, "Ad Herennium", has a good passage on 'significatio', which is all about 'implicature'.
Of course, Grice was concerned with "p & q" and "q & p", i.e. a meta-philosophical inquiry into misuses of 'imply' by philosophers.
The author of Ad Herennium is rather interested in teaching his fellow student (he is working with lecture notes by a 'doctor') how to embellish a speech.
He says:
Significatio est res
quae plus in suspicione relinquit quam positum est in
oratione.
The subject is "signification". And it is defined as something that has to do with 'suspecting', and what is 'put' or 'posited' in the oration -- and what is not!
He goes on to distinguish five types of 'implicature' (what Greek Grice would call 'emphasis".
Ea fit per exsuperationem, ambiguum,
consequentiam, abscisionem,
similitudinem.
Per exsuperationem, cum
plus est dictum quam patitur Veritas,
augendae suspicionis causa, sic :
Hie de tanto patrimonio
tam cito testam qui sibi petat ignem non
reliquit."
Per ambiguum, cum verbum
potest in duas pluresve sententias accipi, sed
accipitur tamen in cam partem quam vult is qui dixit ;
ut de eo si dicas qui multas hereditates adierit :
" Prospice tu, qui plurimum cernis."
Ambigua quemadmodum vitanda sunt quae obscuram
reddunt orationem, item haec
consequenda quae conficiunt
huiusmodi significationem. Ea reperientur
facile si noverimus et animum adverterimus
verborum ancipites aut multiplices potestates.
emphasis is
"meaning
conveyed by implication".
The editor adds: "Really more a trope than a
figure".
I disagree. And so does Grice: "implicature" as a 'figure of speech'.
Cf. Quintilian, 8. 3. 83 : " There are two kinds of
Emphasis; one means more than it says, the other often means
something it does not say."
^ See 4. xxxiii. 44
above (superlatio).
« This passage is in the
spirit of the excerpts, in Cicero, De
Oratore 2. 55. 223-6,
from the speech delivered in probably
The translator goes:
"Emphasis is the
figure which leaves more to be suspected than has been
actually asserted."
"It is produced through
Hyperbole, Ambiguity, Logical Consequence,
Aposiopesis, and Analogy."
The emphasis is produced
through Hyperbole when more is said than
the truth warrants, so as to give greater force to
the suspicion, as follows:
"Out of so great a patrimony,
in so short a time, this man has not laid by even an
earthen pitcher wherewith to seek a fire for
himself."
The emphasis is produced
through Ambiguity when a word can be taken
in two or more senses, but yet is taken in that
sense which the speaker intends ; for example, if you should
say concerning a man who has come into many
legacies: " Just look out, you, who look out for
yourself so profitably."'^ hlV. p],ven
as we must avoid those
ambiguities which render
the style obscure, so
must we seek those which
produce an emphasis of
this sort. It will be easy to
find them if we know and
pay heed to the double and
multiple meanings of
words.
-----
continuation of footnote from previous page:
91 B.C. by L. Lifinius
Crassus on behalf of Cn. Planc(i)us
against M. Junius
Brutus, who had squandered his patrimony.
Kroehnert, p. .31,
thinks it may come from this speech, but
there is no real
evidence for the ascription.
Quintilian, 6. 3. 47
flF., considers the play on double
meanings only rarely
teUing, unless helped out by the facts.
" The play is upon
the double meaning of cernere : to " dis-
cern " and, in
judicial language, " to enter upon an in-
heritance; " thus :
" you who know exceedingly well how to
enter upon
bequests."
Per consequentiam
significatio fit cum res quae sequantur aliquam rem
dicuntur, ex quibus tota res relinquitur in
suspicione ; ut si salsamentarii filio
dicas : " Quiesce
tu, cuius pater cubito se emungere ^ solebat."
Per abscisionem, si, cum
incipimus aliquid dicere,
deinde praecidamus, et
ex eo quod iam diximus satis
relinquitur suspicionis,
sic : " Qui ista forma et aetate
nuper alienae domi —
nolo plura dicere."
Per similitudinem, cum
aliqua re simili allata nihil
amplius dicimus, sed ex
ea significamus quid sen-
tiamus, hoc modo :
" Noli, Saturnine, nimium populi
frequentia fretus esse;
inulti iacent Gracci."
Haec exornatio plurimum
festivitatis habet inter-
dum et dignitatis ;
sinit enim quiddam tacito oratore
ipsum auditorem
suspicari.
68 Brevitas est res
ipsis tantummodo verbis necessariis
expedita, hoc modo:
" Lemnum praeteriens cepit,
inde Thasi praesidium
reliquit, post urbem Bithynam
1 cubito se emungere E :
cubiti seraugire H : cubitis emungi
CIl3Ix : cubiti semugi P
: cubitis emugi B.
" iiraKoXovOrjaiS'
* The saying is common,
e.g., with reference to the freedman
father of the poet
Horace, in Suetonius, De Viris Illustrihus,
Vita Horatii, and to the
freedman father of Bion of Borys-
thenes (first half,
third century B.C.), in Diogenes Laertius
4. 46. Cf. also
Plutarch, Quaest. Conviv. 2. 4 (631 D), and,
illustrating
oKa>iJ.fxa {contumelia celata), Macrobius, Sat. 7. 3. 6.
' See 4. XXX. 41 above
{praecisio).
^ L. Appuleius
Saturninus, of praetorian descent, after
being removed from the
quaestorship by the Senate, joined
the populares, and
thereafter by demagoguery and violence
402
AD HERENNIUM, IV. liv.
67 6S
Emphasis by Logical
Consequence " is produced
when one mentions the
things that follow from a
given circumstance, thus
leaving the whole matter in
distrust ; for example,
if you should say to the son of
a fishmonger:
"Quiet, you, whose father used to
wipe his nose with his
forearm." ^
The emphasis is produced
through Aposiopesis '^ if
we begin to say
something and then stop short, and
what we have already
said leaves enough to arouse
suspicion, as follows:
" He who so handsome and so
young, recently at a
stranger's house — I am unwilling
to say more."
The emphasis is produced
through Analogy, when
we cite some analogue
and do not amplify it, but by
its means intimate what
we are thinking, as follows :
" Do not,
Saturninus, rely too much on the popular
mob — unavenged lie the
Gracchi." '^
This figure sometimes
possesses liveliness and
distinction in the
highest degree ; indeed it permits
the hearer himself to
guess what the speaker has not
mentioned.
68 Conciseness ^ is the
expressing of an idea by the
very minimum of
essential words, as follows : " On
his way he took Lemnus,
then left a garrison at
Thasus, after that
destroyed the Bithynian city,
fought the Senate until
he was, in 100 b.c, declared a public
enemy by that body and
slain, the mob participating; see
note on 4. xxii. 31
above. Saturninus was influenced by the
political ideas of C.
Gracchus. On his grain-bill see 1. xii. 21
above.
* ^paxvXoyla. Also, from
another point of view, iniTpo-
XaofjLos. Cf. distincte
concisa brevitas and percursio in Cicero, De
Oraiore 3. 53. 202.
Quintilian in 9. 3. 99 denies that fipaxv-
Aoyta is a figure, yet
in 9. 3. 50 treats it as a form of
As3ndeton.
403
[CICERO]
Cium ^ sustulit, inde re
versus ^ in Hellespontum
statim potitur Abydi
". Item : " Modo consul
quondam, is deinde
primus erat civitatis ; turn pro-
ficiscitur in Asiam ;
deinde hostis et exul est dictus ;
post imperator, et
postremo vii ^ factus est consul."
Habet paucis conprehensa
brevitas multarum rerum
expeditionem. Quare
adhibenda saepe est, cum aut
res non egent longae
orationis aut tempus non sinet
commorari.
LV. Demonstratio est cum
ita verbis res exprimi-
tur ut geri negotium et
res ante oculos esse videatur.
Id fieri poterit si quae
ante et post et in ipsa re facta
1 Bithynam Cium Muenzer :
bithinia b : bithinnia v :
bithana / : viminachium
31, Viminacium 3Ix.
2 reversus Baiter-Kayser
: rursiis C : sulsus HPB U :
pulsus 3Ix.
^ Insertion of vii
suggested by Omnibonus and Mx.
" Text and
reference are uncertain. Friedrich Muenzer
(Philologus 89 [1934].
215-25) believes that the expedition
made in 202-200 b.c. by
Philip V of Macedon (Rome declared
war in 200) is
indicated. Cius was the city on the Propontis
in Bithynia. The
Rhodians were active against Philip;
this passage may come from
an actual oration, perhaps
delivered, Muenzer
thinks, bv Apollonius Molo or Apollonius
ofiaXaKos. W. Warde
Fowler, Class. Rev. 29 (1915). 136-7,
and Roman Essays and
Interpretations, Oxford, 1920, pp.
95-99, thinks the
reference is to Lucullus and his fleet in 84
(85) B.C., when he was
clearing the Hellespont and Aegean of
the lorces of
Mithridates for Sulla. Marx ( Viminachmi),
Rhein. Mus. 47 (1892).
157-9, doubts the possibility of
establishing the
reference. For other conjectures, see A.
von Domaszewski,
Jahreshefte der oesterr. archaeol. Inst, in
Wien 5 (1902). 147-9
(Lysimachia, in the Thracian Chersonese,
and Lucullus), and H.
Jordan, Hermes 8 (1874). 75-7 (Lysi-
machia, and Antiochus
III after his defeat in 191 B.C. by the
Romans at Thermopylae).
Alexander Numenii, De
Schemat. (Spengel 3. 22), cites in
404
AD HERENNIUM, IV. liv.
68-lv. 68
Cius ; next, returning
to the Hellespont, he forthwith
occupies Abydus."»
Again: " Just recently consul,
next he was first man of
the state ; then he sets out for
Asia ; next he is
declared a public enemy and exiled ;
after that he is made
general-in-chief and finally
consul for the seventh
time." * Conciseness expresses
a multitude of things
within the limits of but a few
words, and is therefore
to be used often, either when
the facts do not require
a long discourse or when time
will not permit dwelling
upon them.
No comments:
Post a Comment