The Grice Club

Welcome

The Grice Club

The club for all those whose members have no (other) club.

Is Grice the greatest philosopher that ever lived?

Search This Blog

Monday, October 8, 2012

John Jamieson Carswell Smart (B. Phil., Oxon., Corpus Christi) and Herbert Paul Grice (M. A., Oxon., Corpus Christi)

Speranza


John Jamieson Carswell Smart
Born(1920-09-16)16 September 1920
DiedOctober 6, 2012(2012-10-06) (aged 92)
Melbourne, Australia
Era20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern Philosophy
SchoolAustralian Realism, analytic philosophy
Main interestsphilosophy of mind, metaphysics, philosophy of science, political philosophy, philosophy of religion
Notable ideasMind-Brain Identity Theory


John Jamieson Carswell "Jack" Smart AC (September 16, 1920 – October 6, 2012) was an English philosopher and academic who was Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Monash University, Australia.

 

 

Born in Cambridge, England, Smart began his education locally, attending The Leys School, a boarding school in the area.

His younger brothers also became professors: Alastair (1922–1992) was Professor of Art History at Nottingham University; Ninian Smart was a professor of Religious Studies and a pioneer in that field.

Smart's father, William Marshall Smart, was John Couch Adams Astronomer at Cambridge University and later Regius Professor of Astronomy at Glasgow.

In 1950, W. M. Smart was President of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In 1946, Smart graduated from the University of Glasgow with an M.A., followed by a B.Phil. from Oxford University in 1948.

Smart then worked as a Junior Research Fellow at Corpus Christi College, Oxford for two years.

Smart arrived in Australia in August 1950 to take up the Chair of Philosophy at the University of Adelaide, which he occupied from 1950 until 1972.
 
After twenty-two years in Adelaide, Smart moved to La Trobe University where he was Reader in Philosophy from 1972-76. 
 
Smart then moved to the Australian National University where he was Professor of Philosophy in the Research School of Social Sciences from 1976 until his retirement in 1985, and where the annual "Smart Lecture" is held in his honor.
 
Following his retirement Smart was Emeritus Professor at Monash University.
 
In 1990 Smart was awarded the Companion in the General Division of the Order of Australia.
 
In 1991 Smart was elected to become, like Grice, a honorary Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford Oxford University and in 2010, elected to become an honorary Fellow of Queen's College, Oxford.
 
At first Smart was a behaviourist before becoming an early proponent of Type Identity Theory.

Smart's main contribution to metaphysics is in the area of philosophy of time.
 
Smart has been an influential defender of the B-Theory of time, and of perdurantism.
 
Smart's most important original arguments in this area concern the passage of time, which he claims is an illusion.
 
He argues that if time really passed, then it would make sense to ask at what rate it passes, but this requires some second time-dimension with respect to which passage of normal time can be measured.
 
This in turn faces the same problems, and so there must be a third time-dimension, and so on.
 
This is called the rate of passage argument.
 
Smart has changed his mind about the nature and causes of the illusion of the passage of time.
 
In the 1950s, he held that it was due to people's use of anthropocentric temporal language.
 
He later came to abandon this linguistic explanation of the illusion in favour of a psychological explanation in terms of the passage of memories from short-term to long-term memory.

---- In this, he can be seen to be arguing against Grice's seminal essay in Mind, "Personal Identity", which offers a rather standard, Lockean-type (alla D. Locke, Myself and others) type of memory-based logical construction approach to "I" sentences.

In the philosophy of mind, Smart is a physicalist.
 
In the 1950s, he was one of the originators, with Ullin Place, of the Mind-Brain Identity Theory, which claims that particular states of the mind are identical with particular states of the brain -- and which Grice criticised in "Method in philosophical psychology".
 
Smart's view was dubbed "materialism".
 
Smart's identity theory dealt with some extremely long-standing objections to physicalism by comparing the mind-brain identity thesis to other identity theses well-known from science, such as the thesis that lightning is an electrical discharge, or that the morning star is the evening star.
 
Although these identity theses give rise to puzzles such as Gottlob Frege's puzzle of the Morning Star and Evening Star, in the scientific cases, some claim that it would be absurd to reject the identity theses on this ground.
 
Since the puzzles facing physicalism are strictly analogous to the scientific identity theses, it would then also be absurd to reject physicalism on the grounds that it gives rise to these puzzles.

In meta-ethics, Smart is a defender of utilitarianism, unlike Grice, who remained a Kantian ("duty, not interest").
 
Specifically, Smart defends "extreme", or act utilitarianism, as opposed to "restricted", or rule utilitarianism.
 
The distinction between these two types of ethical theory is explained in Smart's essay Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.
 
Smart gives two arguments against rule utilitarianism.
 
According to the first, rule utilitarianism collapses into act utilitarianism because there is no adequate criterion on what can count as a "rule".
 
According to the second, even if there were such a criterion, the rule utilitarian would be committed to the untenable position of preferring to follow a rule, even if it would be better if the rule were broken, which Smart calls "superstitious rule worship".
 
Another aspect of Smart's ethical theory is his acceptance of a preference theory of well-being, which contrasts with the hedonism associated with "classical" utilitarians such as Jeremy Bentham.
 
Smart's combination of the preference theory with consequentialism is sometimes called "preference utilitarianism".
 
---- There is an Aristotelian side to Smart's "well-being"-based meta-ethics that agrees in part with an approach like Grice's in "The concept of happiness" (final lecture in "Aspects of reason").
 
Smart's arguments against rule utilitarianism have been very influential, contributing to a steady decline in its popularity among ethicists during the late 20th century.
 
Worldwide, his defence of act utilitarianism and preference theory has been less prominent but has influenced philosophers who have worked or been educated in Australia, such as Frank Jackson (who follows Grice in a conventional-implicature approach to "if" sentences), Philip Pettit, and Peter Singer.
 
One of Smart's two entries in the Philosophical Lexicon refers to his approach to the consequences of act utilitarianism: to "outsmart" an opponent is "to embrace the conclusion of one's opponent's reductio ad absurdum argument."
 
This move is more commonly called "biting the bullet".

Notes

^ Smart, Jack. "River of Time". In Anthony Kenny. Essays in Conceptual Analysis. pp. 214–215.
^ J.J.C. Smart, "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism", The Philosophical Quarterly, Oct., 1956, pages 344-354, based on a paper read to the Victorian Branch of the Australasian Association of Psychology and Philosophy, Oct. 1955. Smart later stated that he made mistakes in this essay (for example, that probably maximizing benefit is not the same thing as maximizing probable benefit).

However, perhaps because of this very fact, that is, perhaps because Smart did not fall prey to what might be called the "philosopher's disease" of attempting to be obsessively precise, this essay lays out a good clear, readable presentation of act utilitarianism.
^ J.J.C. Smart, "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism", The Philosophical Quarterly, Oct., 1956, pages 344-354, based on a paper read to the Victorian Branch of the Australasian Association of Psychology and Philosophy, Oct. 1955. Smart's views on rule utilitarianism have been challenged, for example by Alan Gibbard

References

  • J.J.C. Smart
"Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism", The Philosophical Quarterly, Oct., 1956, pages 344-354.

An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics, 1961.

Philosophy and Scientific Realism, 1963. London: Methuen, and in Reprints.

Problems of Space and Time, 1964 (edited, with introduction).

Between Science and Philosophy: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, 1968.

Utilitarianism : For and Against (co-authored with Bernard Williams; 1973.

Ethics, Persuasion and Truth, 1984.

Essays Metaphysical and Moral, 1987.

Atheism and Theism (Great Debates in Philosophy) (including contributions by J.J. Haldane; 1996)

Pettit, Philip; Sylvan, Richard; Norman, Jean (editors); Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J.J.C. Smart, 1987.
Franklin, James, Corrupting the Youth: A History of Philosophy in Australia, 2003

External links

The annual Jack Smart lecture at Philosophy RSSS, the Australian National University.
J.J.C Smart's homepage at Monash University.


 
 
 

 

 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment