Speranza
http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/Archive/whose.html
"Now imagine, if you will, the following blatantly fictional situation. Suppose that Kripke was not in fact the author of the New Theory of Reference. A woman named "Marcus"--let's call her "Ruth [Charlotte] Barcan Marcus" for greater verisimilitude--whose warm body can still be seen tracing out mysterious trajectories through the campus of Yale University, actually did the work in question. The young Kripke went to a talk she gave in 1962 containing the key ideas; almost a decade later, he presented a greatly elaborated version of them without crediting Marcus. Thereafter they were attributed to Kripke."
And so on.
Monday, March 19, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment