-- by JLS
-- for the GC
Quinton wrote in his review of Ernest Gellner, "Words and things" in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:
"Both its style and its content show it
to a pamphlet rather than a fully-fledged
philosophical treatise."
----
"It is written in a none too orderly way."
"Its sociological excursions are marginally relevant."
"Mr. Gellner does not exert himself to identify
very clearly the precise object of his attack;
linguistic philosophy remains to the end a
pretty shapeless affair".
"He relies on stray journalistic lettings-down
of hair."
When he analyses a special case, the result is
"frivolous (...
"uses but not sentences refer"
(I have a terrible feeling I may have gotten the
phrasing of this latter idea wrong)")"
----
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment