H. P. Grice: " æsthetica" and "psychologia rationalis"

• Abaci, U.
• Kant's Justified Dismissal of Artistic Sublimity
• The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66
• 
  
• Allison, H.
• Kant's Theory of Taste, Cambridge.
• Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg,” Inquiry, 46
• Ameriks, K., 
• How to Save Kant's Deduction of Taste
•  Journal of Value Inquiry, 16 reprinted as part of chapter 12 of Ameriks (2003).
• Kant and the Objectivity of Taste
• British Journal of Aesthetics, 23: 3–17; reprinted as part of chapter 12 of Ameriks (2003).
• New Views on Kant's Judgment of Taste,” in Parret (1998); reprinted as chapter 13 of Ameriks 2003.
• Taste, Conceptuality and Objectivity,” Kant Actuel, F. Duscheneau, G. LaFrance and C. Piché (eds.), Montréal/Paris: Bellarmin/Vrin; reprinted as chapter 14 of Ameriks (2003).
• –––, 2003. Interpreting Kant's Critiques, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Aquila, R.
• A New Look at Kant's Aesthetic Judgments,” in Cohen and Guyer (1982).
• –––, 1991. “Unity of Organism, Unity of Thought, and the Unity of the Critique of Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 30 (Supplement): 139–155.
• Baz, A.
• Kant's Principle of Purposiveness, and the Missing Point of (Aesthetic) Judgments,” Kantian Review, 10: 1–32.
• Bell, D.,
• The Art of Judgement,” Mind, 96: 221–244.
• Brandt, R., 1989. The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment. Kant's Transcendental Deductions, E. Förster (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Brittan, G. G.
• Systematicity and Objectivity in the Third Critique,” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 30(Supplement): 167–186.
• Buchdahl, G., 
• –––The Kantian ‘Dynamic of Reason’”. Kant Studies Today, L. W. Beck (ed.), La Salle: Open Court.
• Budd, M., 1998. “Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation Of Nature: Part III: The Sublime in Nature,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 38: 233–250; reprinted in Guyer (ed.) 2003.
• 
  
• Caranti, L.
• Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste” Kant-Studien, 96: 364-374.
• 
  
• Chignell, A.
• Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85(3), 415–433.
• Clewis, R.
• A Case for Kantian Artistic Sublimity: A Response to Abaci,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 68(2): 167–170.
• Cohen, T. and Guyer, P.
• Essays in Kant's Aesthetics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Crawford, D. 
• Reason-Giving in Kant's Aesthetics,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 28: 505–510
• Kant's Aesthetic Theory, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Crowther, P., 
• The Kantian Sublime, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• de Man, P., 1990. Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant. The Textual Sublime: Deconstruction and its Differences, H. J. Silverman and G. E. Aylesworth (eds.), Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Derrida, J., 1981. “Economimesis,” Diacritics, 11: 3–25.
• –––, 1987. The Truth in Painting, translated by G. Bennington and I. McLeod, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Dickie, G.
• The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude
• American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(1): 55–65.
• Elliott, R. K.
• The Unity of Kant's ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgement’,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 8(3): 244–259.
• Floyd, J., 1998. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity,” in Parret (1998).
• Fricke, C., 1990. “Explaining the Inexplicable: The Hypotheses of the Faculty of Reflective Judgment in Kant's Third Critique,” Noûs, 24: 45–62.
• Friedman, M., 1991. “Regulative and Constitutive,” Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement), 30: 73–102.
• –––, 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Gammon, M., 
• Parerga and Pulchritudo adhaerens: A Reading of the Third Moment of the “Analytic of the Beautiful”,” Kant-Studien, 90(2): 148-167.
• Geiger, I., 2003. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien, 94: 273–298.
• Ginsborg, H., 1990. The Role of Taste in Kant's Theory of Cognition, New York, Garland.
• Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Noûs, 24: 63–78.
• On the Key to Kant's Critique of Taste,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72: 290–313.
• –––, 1997. “Lawfulness Without a Law,” Philosophical Topics, 25(1): 37–81.
• –––, 1997a. “Kant on Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, A. Reath, B. Herman and C. Korsgaard (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• –––, 1998. “Kant on the Subjectivity of Taste,” in Parret (1998).
• –––, 2002. Review of Critique of the Power of Judgment (translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, edited by Paul Guyer), Philosophical Review, 111(3): 429–435.
• Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure,” Inquiry, 46(2): 164–181.
• 
  
• Gorodeisky, K., 2010. “A New Look at Kant's View of Aesthetic Testimony,”British Journal of Aesthetics, 50 (1): 53–70.
• Goy, I., 2014. “Epigenetic Theories: Caspar Friedrich Wolff and Immanuel Kant,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Goy, I., 2014a. “Kants Theory of Biology and the Argument from Design,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Goy, I. and Watkins, E. (eds.), 2014. Kant's Theory of Biology, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
• Gracyk, T., 1986. “Sublimity, Ugliness, and Formlessness in Kant's Aesthetic Theory,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 45 (1): 49–56.
• Guyer, P., 1979. Kant and the Claims of Taste, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Pleasure and Society in Kant's Theory of Taste,” in Cohen, T. and Guyer, P. (1982)
• –––, 1990. “Feeling and Freedom: Kant on Aesthetics and Morality,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 48: 137–146; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 1990a. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity,” Noûs, 24: 17–43; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 1990b. “Kant's Conception of Empirical Law,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, (Supplementary Volume) 64: 220–242; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 1993. Kant and the Experience of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• –––, 2000. “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant's Conception of the System of Philosophy,” The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy, S. Sedgwick (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 2001. “Organisms and the Unity of Science,” Kant and the Sciences, E. Watkins (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 2001a. “From Nature to Morality: Kant's New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’”. Architectonik und System in der Philosophie Kants, H. F. Fulda and J. Stolzenberg (eds.), Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 2002. “Ends of Reason and Ends of Nature: The Place of Teleology in Kant's Ethics,” Journal of Value Inquiry, 36: 161–186; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• ––– (ed.), 2003. Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: critical essays, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• –––, 2003a. “Kant's Principles of Reflecting Judgment,” in Guyer (2003).
• –––, 2003b. “Kant on the Systematicity of Nature: Two Puzzles,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 20(3): 277–295; reprinted in Guyer (2005).
• –––, 2003c. “Beauty, Freedom, and Morality: Kant's Lectures on Anthropology and the Development of his Aesthetic Theory,” in Essays on Kant's Anthropology, Brian Jacobs and Patrick Kain (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 135–163; reprinted in Guyer (2005a).
• –––, 2005. “Kant on the Purity of the Ugly,” in Guyer 2005, 141–162.
• –––, 2005a. Kant's System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• –––, 2005b. Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• –––, 2006. “The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited,” in Kukla (ed.) 2006, 162–193; also in Guyer (2005a).
• –––, 2008. “The Psychology of Kant's aesthetics,” in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 39: 483–494.
• –––, 2009. “The Harmony of the Faculties in Recent Books on the Critique of the Power of Judgment,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 201–221.
• –––, 2014. “Freedom, Happiness, and Nature: Kant's Moral Teleology,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Henning, W., 2009. “Annotated Bibliography to Kant's Teleology,” Kant Yearbook, 1: 249–266.
• Hertz, N., 1978. “The Notion of Blockage in the Literature of the Sublime,” Psychoanalysis and the Question of the Text, G. Hartmann (ed.), Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; reprinted in N. Hertz, The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime, New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.
• Hopkins, R., 2001. “Kant, Quasi-Realism and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement,” European Journal of Philosophy, , 9: 166–189.
• Horstmann, R.-P., 1989. “Why Must There Be a Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Judgment?” Kant's Transcendental Deductions, E. Förster (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Hudson, H., 1991. On the Significance of an Analytic of the Ugly in Kant's Deduction of Pure Judgments of Taste. Kant's Aesthetics, R. Meerbote (ed.), Atascadero: Ridgeview.
• Hughes, F., 2006. “On Aesthetic Judgement and our Relation to Nature: Kant's Concept of Purposiveness,” Inquiry, 49: 547–572.
• –––, 2007. Kant's Aesthetic Epistemology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Huneman, P., 2006. “Naturalising purpose: From comparative anatomy to the ‘adventure of reason’,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 37(4): 649–674.
• –––, 2014. “Purposiveness, Necessity, and Contingency,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Illetterati, L., 2014. “Teleological Judgment: Between Technique and Nature,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Janaway, C., 1997. “Kant's Aesthetics and the ‘Empty Cognitive Stock’,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 1997: 459–476; reprinted in Guyer (2003).
• Kain, P., 2009. “Kant's Defense of Human Moral Status,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47 (1): 59–101.
• Kalar, B., 2006. The Demands of Taste in Kant's Aesthetics, London and New York: Continuum.
• Kemal, S., 1986. Kant and Fine Art, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Kitcher, Patricia., 1990. Kant's Transcendental Psychology, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kitcher, Philip, 1986. “Projecting the Order of Nature,” Kant's Philosophy of Material Nature, R. Butts (ed.), Boston: D. Reidel: 201–235.
• –––, 1994. “The Unity of Science and the Unity of Nature,” Kant's Epistemology and Theory of Science, P. Parrini (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Kivy, P., 2009. Antithetical Arts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kneller, J., 1986. “Kant's Concept of Beauty,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 3: 311–24.
• Kreines, J., 2005. “The Inexplicability of Kant's Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation and Biology,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87: 270–311.
• Kukla, R. (ed.), 2006. Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kulenkampff, J., 1990. “The Objectivity of Taste: Hume and Kant,” Noûs, 24: 93–100.
• Lenoir, T., 1980. “Kant, Blumenbach, and Vital Materialism in German Biology,” Isis, 71 (No. 256): 77–108.
• Longuenesse, B., 2003. “Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste,” Inquiry, 46(2): 146–163.
• –––, 2006. “Kant's Leading Thread in the Analytic of the Beautiful,” in Kukla (2006).
• Lorand, R., 1989. “Free and Dependent Beauty: A Puzzling Issue,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 29(1): 32–40.
• Lyotard, J.-F., 1994. Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublim, translated by E. Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Makkai, K., 2009. “Kant on Recognizing Beauty,” European Journal of Philosophy, 18(3): 385–413.
• –––, 2010. “Kant on Recognizing Beauty,” European Journal of Philosophy, 18(3) 385–413.
• Makkreel, R., 1990. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Marc-Wogau, K., 1938. Vier Studien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft, Uppsala: Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift.
• McConnell, S., 2008. “How Kant Might Explain Ugliness”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 48: 205–28.
• McFarland, J. D., 1970. Kant's Concept of Teleology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• McLaughlin, P., 1989. “What is an Antinomy of Judgment?” Proceedings: Sixth International Kant Congress, G. Funke and T. M. Seebohm (eds.) Washington, D.C.: University Press of America. II/2: 357–367.
• –––, 1990. Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
• –––, 2001. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• –––, 2014. “Mechanical Explanation in the ‘Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment’,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Meerbote, R., 1982. “Reflection on Beauty,” in Cohen and Guyer (1982).
• Moran, Richard., 2012. “Kant, Proust, and the Appeal of Beauty,” Critical Inquiry, 38(2): 298–329.
• Myskja, B. K., 2002. The Sublime in Kant and Beckett: Aesthetic Judgement, Ethics and Literature, Berlin: De Gruyter.
• Nuzzo, A., 2009. “Kritik der Urteilskraft, §§76–77: Reflective Judgment and the Limits of Transcendental Philosophy,” Kant Yearbook, 1: 143–172.
• Palmer, L., 2008. “A Universality Not Based on Concepts: Kant's Key to the Critique of Taste. ” Kantian Review, 13 (1): 1–57
• Parret, H. (ed.), 1998. Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant, Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
• –––, 1998a. “Kant on Music and the Hierarchy of the Arts,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56 (3): 251–64.
• Pillow, K., 2000. Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• –––, 2006. “Understanding Aestheticized,” in Kukla (2006).
• Pippin, R., 1996. “The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic and Reflective Judgment,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 34(4): 549–569.
• Quarfood, M., 2004. Transcendental Idealism and the Organism, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
• –––, 2006. “Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-Level Interpretation,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 37(4): 735–747.
• –––, 2014. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment: What It Is and How It Is Solved?” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Richards, R., 2000. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 31(1): 11–32.
• Rind, M., 2000. “What is Claimed in a Kantian Judgment of Taste?” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38(1): 63–85.
• –––, 2002. “Can Kant's Deduction of Judgments of Taste Be Saved?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 84: 20–45.
• Rogerson, K., 1982. “The Meaning of Universality in Kant's Aesthetics,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 40(3): 301–308.
• –––, 1986. Kant's Aesthetics: The Roles of Form and Expression, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
• –––, 2004. “Kant on beauty and morality,” Kant-Studien, 95(3): 338-354.
• –––, 2008. The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant's Aesthetics, Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
• Roth, S., 2014. “Kant, Polanyi, and Molecular Biology” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Rueger, A., 2009. “Enjoying the Unbeautiful: From Mendelssohn's Theory of ‘Mixed Sentiments’ to Kant's Aesthetic Judgments of Reflection,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 67(2): 181–189.
• Rueger, A. and Evren, S., 2005. “The Role of Symbolic Presentation in Kant's Theory of Taste,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 45 (3): 229–247.
• Savile, A., 1981. “Objectivity in Kant's Aesthetic Judgment: Eva Schaper on Kant,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 21: 364–369.
• –––, 1987. Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant, and Schiller, Oxford: Blackwell.
• –––, 1993. Kantian Aesthetics Pursued, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Scarre, G., 1981. “Kant On Free And Dependent Beauty,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 21: 351–362.
• Schaper, E., 1979. Studies in Kant's Aesthetics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Schopenhauer, A., 1969. The World as Will and Representation, translated by E. J. Payne. New York: Dover Publications.
• Shier, D., 1998. “ Why Kant Finds Nothing Ugly,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 38: 412 –418.
• Steigerwald, J., 2006. “Kant's Concept of Natural Purpose and the Reflecting Power of Judgement,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 37(4): 712–734.
• Šustar, P., 2014. “Kant's Account of Biological Causation,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Sweet, K., 2009. “Reflection: Its Structure and Meaning in Kant's Judgements of Taste,” Kantian Review, 14(1): 53–80.
• Teufel, T., 2011. “Kant's Non-Teleological Conception of Purposiveness,” Kant-Studien, 102: 232–252.
• Tonelli, G., 1954. “La formazione del testo della Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 30: 423–448.
• –––, 1958. “Von den verschiedenen Bedeutungen des Wortes Zweckmässigkeit in der Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien, 49: 154-166
• Vandenabeele, B., 2008. “The subjective universality of aesthetic judgments revisited,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 64: 254–258.
• Walker, R., 1990. “Kant's Conception of Empirical Law,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 48(4): 410–425.
• Walsh, D.-M., 2006. “Organisms as Natural Purposes: The Contemporary Evolutionary Perspective,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 37(4): 771–791.
• Watkins, E., 2009. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment,” Kant Yearbook, 1: 197–221.
• –––, 2014. “Nature in General as a System of Ends,” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Weatherston, M., 1996. “Kant's Assessment of Music in the Critique of Judgment,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 36: 56–65.
• Weiskel, Thomas, 1976. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Wenzel, C., 1999. “Kant Finds Nothing Ugly?” British Journal of Aesthetics, 39 (4): 416–422.
• –––, 2009. “Kant's Aesthetics: Overview and Recent Literature,” Philosophy Compass, 4 (3): 380–406.
• Wicks, R., 2007. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on Judgment, Routledge.
• Wilson, R., 2007. Subjective Universality in Kant's Aesthetics, Oxford: Peter Lang.
• Zammito, J. H., 1992. The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• –––, 2006. “Teleology Then and Now: The Question of Kant's Relevance for Contemporary Controversies Over Function in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 37(4): 748–770
• –––, 2012. “The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part C), 43(1): 120–132.
• Zanetti, V., 1993. “Die Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien, 83: 341-355.
• Zangwill, N., 1992. “UnKantian Notions of Disinterest,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 32(2): 149–152; reprinted in Guyer (2003).
• Zinkin, M., 2006. “Intensive Magnitudes and the Normativity of Taste,” in Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Zuckert, R., 2002. “A New Look at Kant's Theory of Pleasure,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60: 239–252.
• –––, 2007. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• –––, 2007a. “Kant's Rationalist Aesthetics,” Kant-Studien, 98: 443-463.
• –––, 2014. “Organisms and Metaphysics: Kant's First Herder Review” in Goy and Watkins (eds.) 2014.
• Zumbach, C., 1984. The Transcendent Science, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.