by J. L. Speranza
for the Grice Club.
Grice posits two goals for the construction of his natural deduction system. These are listed in ssection II of "Vacuous Names" entitled, "Objectives".
First goal:
To allow for a reading of "Pegasus does not fly" (with caveats for formulae, which, in Grice's words, 'do not explicitly involve [the] negation-device')
such that, on that reading, an utterance of "Pegasus does not fly" CANNOT BE TRUE -- "given that Pegasus does not exist".
This is a reading where ~ does not have the standard maximal scope. So the reading will involve a subscript device appended to the formation rules of the system. In Grice's notational variant, elsewhere, perhaps vis a vis Quine's reply in Davidson/Hintikka -- 'forbiddingly complex' -- Grice opted for 'square brackets' --.
Interestingly, Grice expounds the caveat as being,
given that Pegasus does not exist
and never has existed --
for all we know, that is!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment