In Parsons's proposal, as Grice notes,
"normal parentheses are retained"
but "the scope of an individual constant
OR bound variable" is
indicated by an occurrence of the
constant or variable in square brackets.
----
This is "followed by parentheses which
mark the scope boundaries."
----
As Grice notes, perspicuous as it may seem, Parsons's notation fails to mirror 'the obvious "link between subscripts and formation-rules."
---
These are Parsons's rewrites:
~[a[(Fa)
vs
[a](~Fa)
-----
Also:
(Ex)(~[x](Fx))
vs.
(Ex)([x](~Fx))
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment