--- where Grice uses square corners for ' and '.
Grice wants to define 'a+exists' in terms of the horseshoe as follows:
Consider
Fa
With the proper subscripts, this becomes
F1a2
Surely we can apply the horseshoe and yield:
F1a2 )3 F1a2
Now,
"F1a2 )3 F1a2", Grice says, 'is true whether or not 'a' is vacuous.'
---
The truth of that ) formula, then, in which "a" is dominant,
'requires only that a exists'.
So, the horseshoe formula
"may be taken as one representation of 'a exists'".
He wants to define this in terms of variables for subscripts and not the boring 1,2 and 3.
In the general terms, it reads:
If, for some n) alpha is the
ONLY individual constant in phi[n](alphan) and phi is
psi ) psin-m,
phi is 'a exists'.
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment