Grice in Maria Reicher's bibliography on nonexistent objects

From her entry in the online Stanford encyclopedia:

•Azzouni, Jody (2004): Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
•Barbero, Carola (2005): Madame Bovary: Something Like a Melody. Milano: Edizioni Albo Versorio.
•Brentano, Franz (1874): Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Translated by Anto C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister. Introduced by Peter Simons. London: Routledge, 1995.
•Brock, Stuart (2002): “Fictionalism about Fictional Characters”. Noûs 36, 1–21.
•Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1972): “Thinking and the Structure of the World”. Critica 6, 43–86.
•Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1979): “Fiction and Reality: Their Fundamental Connections. An Essay on the Ontology of Total Experience”. Poetics 8, 31–62.
•Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1990): “Fiction, Perception, and Forms of Predication (Reply to Künne)”. In: Jacobi, Klaus/Pape, Helmut (eds.), Thinking and the Structure of the World. Hector-Neri Castañeda's Epistemic Ontology Presented and Criticised. Berlin: de Gruyter, 268–284.
•Chakrabarti, Arindam (1997): Denying Existence. The Logic, Epistemology and Pragmatics of Negative Existentials and Fictional Discourse. Synthese Library 261, Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer.
•Chisholm, Roderick M. (1972): “Beyond Being and Nonbeing”. In: Haller, Rudolf (ed.), Jenseits von Sein und Nichtsein. Beiträge zur Meinong-Forschung. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 25–33.
•Everett, Anthony (2005): “Against Fictional Realism”. Journal of Philosophy 102, 624–649.
•Findlay, John N. (1963): Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values. London: Oxford University Press.
•Fine, Kit (1982): “The Problem of Non-existents. I. Internalism.” Topoi 1, 97–140.
•Fine, Kit (1983): “Symposium: A Defence of Arbitrary Objects, I”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 57, 55–77.
•Fine, Kit (1984): “Critical Review of Parsons' Nonexistent Objects”. Philosophical Studies 45, 94–142.
•Fine, Kit (1985): Reasoning With Arbitrary Objects. Oxford: Blackwell.
•Frege, Gottlob (1966): “Function and Concept”. Translated by P. T. Geach. In: Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Edited by Peter Geach and Max Black. Oxford: Blackwell, 21–41.
•Geach, Peter Thomas (1971): [Review of:] Rush Rhees,Without Answers. Journal of Philosophy 68, 531–532.

-----
GRICE, VACUOUS NAMES -- missing!!!!!
----


•Griffin, Nicholas (1985–86): “Russell's Critique of Meinong's Theory of Objects”. In: Haller, Rudolf (ed.), Non-Existence and Predication. Amsterdam: Rodopi (= Grazer Philosophische Studien 25/26), 375–401.
•Grossmann, Reinhardt (1974): Meinong. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
•Grossmann, Reinhardt (2001): “Meinong's Main Mistake”. In: Albertazzi, Liliana/Jacquette, Dale/Poli, Roberto (eds.), The School of Alexius Meinong. Western Philosophy Series 57. Aldershot et al.: Ashgate, 477–488.
•Hinchliff, Mark (1988): A Defense of Presentism. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.
•Hintikka, Jaakko (1959): “Existential Presuppositions and Existential Commitments”. Journal of Philosophy 56, 125–137.
•Hintikka, Jaakko (1984): “Are There Nonexistent Objects? Why Not? But Where Are They?” Synthese 60, 451–458.
•Howell, Robert (1979): “Fictional Objects: How They Are and How They Aren't”. Poetics 8, 129–177.
•Hume, David (2000): A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Jackson, Frank (1980): “Ontological Commitment and Paraphrase”. Philosophy 55, 303–315.
•Jacquette, Dale (1989a): “On the Objects' Independence from Thought, by Ernst Mally: Translation and Commentary”. Man and World 22, 215–231.
•Jacquette, Dale (1989b): “Mally's Heresy and the Logic of Meinong's Object Theory”. History of Philosophical Logic 10, 1–14.
•Jacquette, Dale (1996): Meinongian Logic. The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence. Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy 11. Berlin–New York: de Gruyter.
•Kant, Immanuel (2003): Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. With a new preface by Howard Caygill. New York et al.: Palgrave Macmillan.
•Künne, Wolfgang (1990): “Perception, Fiction, and Elliptical Speech”. In: Jacobi, Klaus/Pape, Helmut (eds.), Thinking and the Structure of the World. Hector-Neri Castañeda's Epistemic Ontology Presented and Criticised. Berlin: de Gruyter, 259–267.
•Lambert, Karel (1982): “A Logical Interpretation of Meinong's Principle of Independence”. Topoi 1–2, 87–96.
•Lambert, Karel (1983): Meinong and the Principle of Independence. Its Place in Meinong's Theory of Objects and Its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Lambert, Karel (ed.) (1991): Philosophical Applications of Free Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
•Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1976): Discourse on Metaphysics / Correspondence with Arnauld / Monadology. Chicago: Open Court.
•Lejewski, Czeslaw (1954): “Logic and Existence”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5, 104–119.
•Leonard, Henry S. (1956): “The Logic of Existence”. Philosophical Studies 7, 49–64.
•Lewis, David (1990): “Noneism or Allism?” Mind 99, 23–31.
•Lewis, David (2004): “Tensed Quantifiers”. In: Zimmerman, Dean W. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–14.
•Linsky, Bernard/Zalta, Edward N. (1994): “In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic”. Philosophical Perspectives 8. Logic and Language, 431–458.
•Macdonald, Margaret (1954): “The Language of Fiction”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 27, 165–184.
•Mally, Ernst (1912): “Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Logik und Logistik”. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 148, Ergänzungsheft. Leipzig.
•Markosian, Ned (2004): “A Defense of Presentism”. In: Zimmerman, Dean W. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 47–82.
•McGinn, Colin (2000): Logical Properties. Identity, Existence, Predication, Necessity, Truth. Oxford: Clarendon.
•Meinong, Alexius (ed.) (1904): Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth.
•Meinong, Alexius (1960): “On the Theory of Objects”. In: Chisholm, Roderick M. (ed.), Realism and the Background of Phenomenology. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 76–117. [German original first published in Meinong 1904.]
•Meinong, Alexius (1972): Über Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit. In: Haller, Rudolf/Kindinger, Rudolf (eds.), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe VI. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. [Originally published in 1915.]
•Meinong, Alexius (1973): “Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften”. In: Haller, Rudolf/Kindinger, Rudolf (eds.), Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe V. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 197–365. [Originally published in 1907.]
•Parsons, Terence (1975): “A Meinongian Analysis of Fictional Objects”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 1, 73–86.
•Parsons, Terence (1980): Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
•Parsons, Terence (1982): “Are There Nonexistent Objects?” American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 365–371.
•Pasniczek, Jacek (1997): The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
•Pasniczek, Jacek (2001): “The Meinongian Logic of Fiction”. In: Albertazzi, Liliana/Jacquette, Dale/Poli, Roberto (eds.), The School of Alexius Meinong. Western Philosophy Series 57. Aldershot et al.: Ashgate, 457–476.
•Perszyk, Kenneth J. (1993): Nonexistent Objects. Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy. Nihoff International Philosophy Series 49. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
•Priest, Graham (2005): Towards Non-Being. The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon.
•Prior, A. N. (1968): Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
•Prior, A. N. (1971): Objects of Thought. Ed. by P. T. Geach und A. J. P. Kenny. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
•Quine, Willard van Orman (1953): “On What There Is”. In: From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1–19.
•Rapaport, William J. (1978): “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox”. Noûs 12, 153–180.
•Rapaport, William J. (1981): “How to Make the World Fit Our Language: An Essay in Meinongian Semantics”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 14, 1–21.
•Reid, Thomas (1785): Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Ed. by Derek R. Brookes. University Park, Penns.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.
•Reicher, Maria Elisabeth (2001): “Predicable and Non-Predicable Universals”. In: Meixner, Uwe (ed.), Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Proceedings of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium. Kirchberg am Wechsel (Austria) 1999. Schriftenreihe der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft 28, Wien: öbv&hpt, 89–98.
•Reicher, Maria Elisabeth (2005a): Referenz, Quantifikation und ontologische Festlegung. Frankfurt/Main: Ontos.
•Reicher, Maria Elisabeth (2005b): “Russell, Meinong, and the Problem of Existent Nonexistents”. In: Imaguire, Guido/ Linsky, Bernard (eds.), On Denoting: 1905–2005. München: Philosophia, 167–193.
•Rescher, Nicholas (1969): “The Concept of Non-Existent Possibles”. In: Essays in Philosophical Analysis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
•Routley, Richard (1966): “Some Things Do Not Exist”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7, 251–276.
•Routley, Richard (1979): “The Semantical Structure of Fictional Discourse”. Poetics 8, 3–30.
•Routley, Richard (1980): Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond. An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items. Canberra.
•Russell, Bertrand (1903): Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Russell, Bertrand (1973a): “Review of: A. Meinong, Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie”. In: Lackey, Douglas (ed.), Bertrand Russell. Essays in Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin, 77–88. [Originally published in Mind 14 (1905), 530–538].
•Russell, Bertrand (1973b): “Review of: A. Meinong, ‘Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften’”. In: Lackey, Douglas (ed.), Bertrand Russell. Essays in Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin, 89–93. [Originally published in Mind 16 (1907), 436–439].
•Russell, Bertrand (1973c): “On Denoting”. In: Lackey, Douglas (ed.), Bertrand Russell. Essays in Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin, 103–119. [Originally published in Mind 14 (1905), 479–493.]
•Searle, John R. (1983): Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
•Sierszulska, Anna (2005): Meinong on Meaning and Truth. Frankfurt/Main: Ontos.
•Simons, Peter (1992): “On What There Isn't: The Meinong-Russell Dispute”. In: Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Selected Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 159–191.
•Simons, Peter M. (1994): “Meinong's Contribution to the Development of Non-Classical Logic”. Conceptus 27, no. 71, 187–202.
•Smith, Barry (1980/81): “Ingarden vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, no. 1, 93–105.
•Smith, David W. (1975): “Meinongian Objects”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 1, 43–71.
•Smith, Janet Farrell (1985): “The Russell-Meinong Debate”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 305–350.
•Thomasson, Amie L. (1996): “Fiction, Modality and Dependent Abstracta”. Philosophical Studies 84, 295–320.
•van Inwagen, Peter (1977): “Creatures of Fiction”. American Philosophical Quarterly 14, no. 4, 299–308.
•White, Morton (1968): “The Use of ‘Exists’”. In: Iseminger, Gary (ed.), Logic and Philosophy. New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts, 127–145.
•Williams, C. J. F. (1981): What Is Existence? Oxford: Clarendon.
•Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1980): Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon.
•Zalta, Edward N. (1983): Abstract Objects. An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
•Zalta, Edward N. (1988): Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
•Zalta, Edward N. (1992): “On Mally's Alleged Heresy: A Reply”. History of Philosophical Logic 13, no. 1, 59–68.
•Zalta, Edward N. (1995): “Two (Related) World Views”. Noûs 29, no. 2, 189–211.
•Zemach, Eddy M. (1993): “Existence and Nonexistents”. Erkenntnis 39, 145–166.
•Zemach, Eddy M. (1996): “Emotion and Fictional Beings”. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54, 41–48.