As Jones notes:
"By way of trivia, there seems to be a typo at the bottom of page 135, last para, first sentence final word is "description" and should be "designatum"".
Indeed. It is the last paragraph.
It reads:
"It will be noted that, as I envisage them,
interpreations of Q will be of a non-standard
type"
--- in that they will give a nod to Meinong, if not planting a jungle
"in that a distinction is made
between the correlation of an
individual constant" -- or correlatum, even better.
"and its description" -- or, rather, 'designatum'.
----
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment