HERBERT PAUL GRICE, "CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE," THE OXFORD LECTURES, 1966, BANC MSS 90/135c

Speranza

Allwood, Jens.
Abduction, belief, and context in dialogue: studies in computational pragmatics chap. An activity based approach to pragmatics, 47–78. John Benjamins.

Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1995. La th´eorie des topoi: S´emantique ou rh´etorique? Herm´es 15.

Aristotle, George A. Kennedy. 2007. On rhetoric, a theory of civic discourse. Oxford University Press.

Aristotle, Robin Smith. 1989. Prior analytics / aristotle; translated with introduction. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press. Baker, G. P. & P. M. S. Hacker. 2009. Wittgenstein - understanding and meaning, vol. 1 An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations. Wiley-Blackwell 2nd edn. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, University of Texas Press. Barwise, Jon & John Perry. 1983. Situations and attitudes. MIT Press. Breitholtz, Ellen. 2014. Reasoning with topoi - towards a rhetorical approach to non-monotonicity, vol. Proceedings of the 50:th anniversery convention of the AISB, 190–198. AISB. Breitholtz, Ellen & Robin Cooper. 2011. Enthymemes as rhetorical resources. In David DeVault Kallirroi Georgila Elsi Kaiser Amanda Stent 157 158 BIBLIOGRAPHY Ron Artstein, Mark Core (ed.), Proceedings of, vol. SemDial 2011 (LosAngelogue) Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, 149–157. Breitholtz, Ellen & Jessica Villing. 2008. Can aristotelian enthymemes decrease the cognitive load of a dialogue system user? In Proceedings of londial 2008, the 12th semdial workshop, . Carlson, Lauri Henrik. 1982. Dialogue games: An approach to discourse analysis: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation. Carston, Robyn & Alison Hall. 2012. Implicature and explicature. Cognitive Pragmatics (4). 47–84. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge University Press. Cooper, Robin. 2005a. Austinian truth, attitudes and type theory. Research on Language and Computation 3. 333–362. Cooper, Robin. 2005b. Records and record types in semantic theory. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(2). 99–112. Cooper, Robin. 2012. Type theory and semantics in flux. In Ruth Kempson, Nicholas Asher & Tim Fernando (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science, vol. 14: Philosophy of Linguistics, Elsevier BV. https://sites.google.com/site/typetheorywithrecords/drafts/ddl-final.pdf. General editors: Dov M Gabbay, Paul Thagard and John Woods. Cooper, Robin. 2013. Clarification and generalized quantifiers. Dialogue and Discourse 4(1). Cooper, Robin. in preparation. Type theory and language - from perception to linguistic communication. Draft, June 17 2014. Cooper, Robin, Simon Dobnik, Shalom Lappin & Sta↵an Larsson. 2014. A probabilistic rich type theory for semantic interpretation. In Proceedings of the eacl 2014 type theory and natural semantics workshop (ttnls), EACL. Cooper, Robin & Jonathan Ginzburg. 2012. Negative inquisitiveness and based negation, vol. Logic, Language and Meaning 32–41. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Cooper, Robin & Sta↵an Larsson. 2009. Compositional and ontological semantics in learning from corrective feedback and explicit definition. In BIBLIOGRAPHY 159 Jens Edlund, Joakim Gustafson, Anna Hjalmarsson & Gabriel Skantze (eds.), Proceedings of diaholmia: 2009 workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, 59–66. Cooper, Robin & Aarne Ranta. 2008. Natural languages as collections of resources. In Robin Cooper & Ruth Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution Communication, Mind and Language, 109–120. College Publications. Corbett, Edward P. J. & Robert J. Connors. 1999. Classical rhetoric for the modern student. Oxford University Press 4th edn. van Dijk, Teun A. 1979. Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatics (3). 447–456. Dreyfus, Stuart E. & Hubert L. Dreyfus. 1980. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in direct skill aquisition. Tech. Rep. 102 Operations research center, University of California, Berkely. Ducrot, Oswald. 1988. Topo¨ı et formes topique. Bulletin d’´etudes de la linguistique fran¸caise 22. 1–14. Ericsson, Stina. 2005. Information enriched constituents in dialogue: University of Gothenburg dissertation. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Edward Arnold. Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the morning calm 111–137. Fine, Kit. 2012. A diculty for the possible world analysis of counterfactuals. Synthese 189(1). 29–57. Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1996. Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. Logic, language and computation 1. Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1998. Clarifying utterances. In Proc. of the twente workshop on the formal semantics and pragmatics of dialogues. universiteit twente, faculteit informatica, enschede, . Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford University Press. http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/ginzburg/papers-new.html. 160 BIBLIOGRAPHY Ginzburg, Jonathan & Matt Purver. 2012. Quantification, the reprise content hypothesis and type theory. In Lars Borin & Sta↵an Larsson (eds.), From quantification to conversation, College Publications.

Grice, H. P. 1937. Negation, BANC MSS 90/135c
Grice, H. P. 1948. Meaning.
Grice, H. P. 1961. The Causal Theory of Perception
Grice, H. P. 1966. Conversational implicature, Oxford. BANC MSS 90/135c
Grice, H. P. 1967. Logic and Conversation: The William James Lectures, Harvard.
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation, vol. 3 41–58. Syntax and Semantics Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. 1988. Valediction. In WoW, Way of Words.
Grice, H. P. 1991. The conception of value. Clarendon.
Grice, H. P. 2001. Aspects of reason. Clarendon.





Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1991. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 39–100. Heim, Irene. 1983. File change semantics and the familiarity theory of defi- niteness. In R. B. B´euerle, Ch Schwarze & A. v. Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, 164–189. de Gruyter. Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 3(9). 183–221. Hopper, Paul J. 2007. Linguistics and micro-rhetoric - a twenty first century encounter. Journal of english linguistics 35(3). 236–252. Horty, John F. 2012. Reasons as defaults. Oxford Scholarship Online. Jackson, Sally & Scott Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66(3). 251–265. Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical linguistics 1(1). 181–194. Keyt, David. 2009. Deductive logic. In George Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A companion to aristotle Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, chap. 3, 31– 50. Blackwell. Lappin, Shalom. 2013. Intensional semantics without possible worlds. Philosophy Colloquium King’s College London. Lappin, Shalom. to appear. Curry typing, polymorphism, and fine-grained intensionality. In Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds.), Handbook of contemporary semantics, Wiley-Blackwell. BIBLIOGRAPHY 161 Larsson, Sta↵an. 2002. Issue based dialogue management: University of Gothenburg dissertation. Larsson, Sta↵an. 2007. A general framework for semantic plasticity and negotiation. In Harry Bunt & E. C. G. Thijsse (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on computational semantics (iwcs-7), 101–107. Larsson, Sta↵an. 2011. Do dialogues have content? In Logical aspects of computational linguistics, 145–158. Springer. Larsson, Sta↵an & Robin Cooper. 2009. Towards a formal view of corrective feedback. In Afra Alishahi, Thierry Poibeau & Aline Villavicencio (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on cognitive aspects of computational language acquisition, . Larsson, Sta↵an & David Traum. 2000. Information state and dialogue management in trindi dialogue move engine tool kit. Natural Language Engineering 6. 323–240. Leth, Palle. 2011. Paraphrase and rhetorical adjustment: An essay on contextualism and cohesion: University of Gothenburg dissertation. Levin, James A. & James A. Moore. 1977. Dialogue-games: Metacommunication structures for natural language interaction. Cognitive Science 1(4). 395–420. Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(1). 339–359. Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making Advances in Cultural Psychology: Constructing Human Development. Information Age Publishing, INC. Mann, William & Sandra Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3). 243–281. Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. Rhetorical structure theory: Description and construction of text structures. Tech. Rep. ISI/RS- 86-174 Information Sciences Institute. McCarthy, John. 1980. Circumscription - a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1). 27–39. 162 BIBLIOGRAPHY McDermott, Drew & Jon Doyle. 1980. Non-monotonic logic i. Artificial Intelligence 13(1). 41–72. Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary english. In Jaakko Hintikka, Julius Moravcsik & Patrik Suppes (eds.), Approaches to natural language, Dordrecht. Ottesj¨o, Cajsa. 2006. Att forts¨atta och att ˚aterg˚a: Studier i koherensskapande praktiker i vardagliga flerpersonssamtal: Gothenburg University dissertation. Perelman, Chaim & Lucie Olbrechts-Tycteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press. Recanati, Fran¸cois. 2001. What is said. Synthese 128(1). 75–91. Recanati, Francois. 2004. Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press. Recanati, Francois. 2012. Mental files. Oxford University Press. Reiter, Raymond. 1980. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1). 81–132. Reiter, Raymond & Giovanni Criscuolo. 1981. On interacting defaults. In Ijcai, 270–276. Rosengren, Mats. 2002. Doxologi : en ess¨a om kunskap. Rhetor f¨orlag. Rosengren, Mats. 2008. Doxologi : en ess¨a om kunskap. Retorikf¨orlaget. Rumelhart, David E. 1978. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego. Rumelhart, David E. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In B. Bruce R. Spiro & W. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligenceand Education, 33–57. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schlangen, David. 2005. Modelling dialogue: Challenges and approaches. K¨unstliche Intelligenz 3. Smith, Robin. 2012. Aristotle’s logic. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2012 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/aristotle-logic/. BIBLIOGRAPHY 163 Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell 2nd edn. Stalnaker. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz & Peter Unger (eds.), Semantics and philosophy, New York University Press. Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7(1). 3–19. Stenning, K. & M. van Lambalgen. 2008. Human reasoning and cognitive science. MIT Press. Strawson, Peter F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59(235). 320–344. Villing, Jessica & Sta↵an Larsson. 2006. Dico: a multimodal menu-based invehicle dialogue system. In brandial06, proceedings of the 10th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, . Walker, Marilyn A. 1996. The e↵ect of resource limits and task complexity on collaborative planning in dialogue. Artificial Intelligence 85(1). 181– 243. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Blackwell.