Speranza
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis. 2008. Innocent exclusion in an alternative semantics.
Natural Language Semantics 16(2). 115–128.
Ariel, Mira. 2004. Most. Language 80(4). 658–706.
Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2013. Strategic conversation. Semantics and
Pragmatics 6(2). 1–62.
Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9(2). 124–162.
Beaver, David I. & Brady Zack Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus
determines meaning. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Benz, Anton. 2005. Utility and relevance of answers. In Anton Benz, Gerhard
Jäger & Robert van Rooij (eds.), Game theory and pragmatics, 195–219.
Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.
Bergen, Leon, Noah D. Goodman & Roger Levy. 2012. That’s what she (could
32
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
have) said: How alternative utterances affect language use. In Proceedings of
the thirty-fourth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive
Science Society.
Bernstein, Daniel S., Robert Givan, Neil Immerman & Shlomo Zilberstein. 2002.
The complexity of decentralized control of Markov Decision Processes. Math.
Oper. Res. 27(4). 819–840. doi:10.1287/moor.27.4.819.297.
Blutner, Reinhard. 1998. Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics 15(2). 115–
162.
Blutner, Reinhard. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation.
Journal of Semantics 17(3). 189–216.
Büring, Daniel. 1999. Topic. In Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds.), Focus
— linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, 142–165. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann. 2001. The syntax and semantics of focussensitive
particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(2).
229–281.
Camerer, Colin F., Teck-Hua Ho & Juin-Kuan Chong. 2004. A cognitive hierarchy
model of games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3). 861–898.
Carston, Robyn. 1988. Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In
Ruth Kempson (ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language
and reality, 155–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chemla, Emmanuel & Benjamin Spector. 2011. Experimental evidence for
embedded scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics 28(3). 359–400.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the
syntax/pragmatics interface. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond:
The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 39–103. New York: Oxford
University Press. [The manuscript began circulating in 2001].
Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector. 2012. The grammatical
view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and
pragmatics. In Maienborn, von Heusinger & Portner (2012) 2297–2332.
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative
process. Cognition 22(1). 1–39.
Clifton, Charles Jr. & Chad Dube. 2010. Embedded implicatures observed: A
comment on Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009). Semantics and Pragmatics 3(7).
1–13.
Dale, Robert & Ehud Reiter. 1995. Computational interpretations of the Gricean
maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science 19(2).
233–263.
Degen, Judith & Michael Franke. 2012. Optimal reasoning about referential
33
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
expressions. In Proceedings of SemDIAL 2012, Paris.
DeVault, David & Matthew Stone. 2007. Managing ambiguities across utterances
in dialogue. In Ron Artstein & Laure Vieu (eds.), Proceedings of DECALOG
2007: Workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, .
Eckardt, Regine. 2007. Licensing ‘or’. In Sauerland & Stateva (2007) 34–70.
Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures.
In Sauerland & Stateva (2007) 71–120.
Fox, Danny. 2009. Too many alternatives: Density, symmetry, and other predicaments.
In Tova Friedman & Edward Gibson (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics
and Linguistic Theory 17, 89–111. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Frank, Michael C. & Noah D. Goodman. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in
language games. Science 336(6084). 998.
Franke, Michael. 2008. Interpretation of optimal signals. In Krzysztof R. Apt
& Robert van Rooij (eds.), New perspectives on games and interaction, vol. 4
Texts in Logics and Games, 297–310. Amsterdam University Press.
Franke, Michael. 2009. Signal to act: Game theory in pragmatics ILLC Dissertation
Series. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of
Amsterdam.
Franke, Michael, Tikitu De Jager & Robert van Rooij. 2009. Relevance
in cooperation and conflict. Journal of Logic and Computation
doi:10.1093/logcom/exp070.
Gajewski, Jon. 2012. Innocent exclusion is not contradiction free. Ms., UConn.
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979a. Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition and logical form.
New York: Academic Press.
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979b. A solution to the projection problem. In Choon-Kyu Oh
& David A. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition,
57–89. New York: Academic Press.
Geurts, Bart. 2009. Scalar implicatures and local pragmatics. Mind and Language
24(1). 51–79.
Geurts, Bart. 2011. Quantity implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
Geurts, Bart & Nausicaa Pouscoulous. 2009. Embedded implicatures?!? Semantics
and Pragmatics 2(4). 1–34.
Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1996. Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In Jerry
Seligman (ed.), Language, logic, and computation, vol. 1, 221–237. Stanford,
CA: CSLI.
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2001. Interrogative investigations: The form,
meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Golland, Dave, Percy Liang & Dan Klein. 2010. A game-theoretic approach to
generating spatial descriptions. In Proceedings of the 2010 conference on
empirical methods in natural language processing, 410–419. Cambridge, MA:
34
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
ACL.
Goodman, Noah D. & Daniel Lassiter. To appear. Probabilistic semantics and pragmatics.
In Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds.), The handbook of contemporary
semantic theory, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2nd edn.
Grice, H. P. 1937. Negation.
Grice, H. P. 1948. Meaning.
Grice, H. P. 1961. The Causal Theory of Perception.
Grice, H. P. 1966. Conversational Implicature: The Oxford Lectures. BANC MSS 90/135c
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan
(eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts, 43–58. New York: Academic
Press.
Grice, H. P. 1988. Valediction.
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1991. The conception of value.
Grice, H. P. 2001. Aspects of reason. Clarendon.
Grodner, Daniel J., Natalie M. Klein, Kathleen M. Carbary & Michael K. Tanenhaus.
2010. “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed:
Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition 116(1). 42–55.
Grodner, Daniel J. & Julie Sedivy. 2008. The effects of speaker-specific information
on pragmatic inferences. In Edward A. Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter
(eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference, 239–272. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies in the semantics of questions
and the pragmatics of answers: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
Heller, Daphna, Daniel J. Grodner & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2008. The role of
perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition 108(3). 831–836.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.008.
Hendriks, Petra, John Hoeks, Helen de Hoop, Irene Krammer, Erik-Jan Smits,
Jennifer Spenader & Henriette de Swart. 2009. A large-scale investigation of
scalar implicature. In Uli Sauerland & Kazuko Yatsushiro (eds.), Semantics
and pragmatics: From experiment to theory Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics,
Language and Cognition, Palgrave Macmillan.
Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. A theory of scalar implicature: University of Pennsylvania
dissertation.
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference:
Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form,
and use in context: Linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown
University Press.
Horn, Laurence R. 1991. Given as new: When redundant affirmation isn’t.
Journal of Pragmatics 15(4). 313–336.
Horn, Laurence R. 1996. Presupposition and implicature. In Lappin (1996)
299–319.
Horn, Laurence R. 2006. The border wars. In Klaus von Heusinger & Ken P.
Turner (eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics, Oxford: Elsevier.
Huang, Ti Ting & Jesse Snedeker. 2009. Online interpretation of scalar quanti-
fiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology
35
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
58(3). 376–415.
Hurford, James R. 1974. Exclusive or inclusive disjunction. Foundations of
Language 11(3). 409–411.
Ippolito, Michela. 2010. Embedded implicatures? Remarks on the debate
between globalist and localist theories. Semantics and Pragmatics 3(5). 1–15.
de Jager, Tikitu & Robert van Rooij. 2007. Deriving quantity implicatures. In
Proceedings of theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge, New York: ACM
Digital Library.
Jäger, Gerhard. 2007. Game dynamics connects semantics and pragmatics. In
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (ed.), Game theory and linguistic meaning, 89–102.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Jäger, Gerhard. 2012. Game theory in semantics and pragmatics. In Maienborn
et al. (2012) 2487–2425.
Joshi, Aravind K. 1982. Mutual belief in question answering systems. In Neil S.
Smith (ed.), Mutual knowledge, 181–197. London: Academic Press.
Keysar, Boaz, Dale J. Barr, Jennifer A. Balin & Jason S. Brauner. 2000. Taking
perspective in conversation: The role for mutal knowledge in comprehension.
Psychological Science 11(1). 32–38.
King, Jeffrey & Jason Stanley. 2006. Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of
semantic content. In Zoltán Szábo (ed.), Semantics vs. pragmatics, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Krahmer, Emiel & Kees van Deemter. 2012. Computational generation of referring
expressions: A survey. Computational Linguistics 38(1). 173–218.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1986. Conditionals. In Anne M. Farley, Peter Farley & Karl Eric
McCollough (eds.), Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical
theory, 115–135. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Lappin, Shalom (ed.). 1996. The handbook of contemporary semantic theory.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Lassiter, Daniel. In progress. Conditional antecedents provide no evidence for a
grammatical theory of scalar implicature. Ms., Stanford University.
Lauer, Sven. 2013. Towards a dynamic pragmatics. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University dissertation.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Frank R. Palmer (ed.),
Grammar and meaning: Essays in honor of Sir John Lyons, 90–115. Cambridge
University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized
conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reprinted 2002 by Blackwell.
36
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lewis, David. 1975. Languages and language. In Keith Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota
studies in the philosophy of science, vol. VII, 3–35. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press. Reprinted in Lewis 1983, 163–188. Page references
are to the reprinting.
Lewis, David. 1983. Philosophical papers, vol. 1. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Lewis, David. 1988. Relevant implication. Theoria 54(3). 161–174.
MacCartney, Bill. 2009. Natural language inference: Stanford University dissertation.
Magri, Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind
mandatory scalar implicatures. Natural Language Semantics 17(3). 245–297.
doi:10.1007/s11050-009-9042-x.
Maienborn, Claudia, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.). 2012. Semantics:
An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
McCarthy, John. 1980. Circumscription — a form of non-monotonic reasoning.
Artificial Intelligence 13(1). 27–39.
McCawley, James D. 1978. Conversational implicature and the lexicon. In Peter
Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 7: Pragmatics, 245–259. New York:
Academic Press.
Merin, Arthur. 1997. If all our arguments had to be conclusive, there would be
few of them. Arbeitspapiere SFB 340 101 University of Stuttgart Stuttgart.
Parikh, Prashant. 2001. The use of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Paris, Scott G. 1973. Comprehension of language connectives and propositional
logical relationships. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16. 278–291.
Partee, Barbara H. & Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type
ambiguity. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow
(eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 361–383. Berlin: Walter
de Gruyter.
Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry J. Tily & Edward A. Gibson. 2011. The communicative
function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122(3). 280—291.
Potts, Christopher. 2012. Goal-driven answers in the Cards dialogue corpus.
In Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th West Coast
Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1–20. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Recanati, Francois. 2003. Embedded implicatures. Philosophical Perspectives
17(1). 299–332.
Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure: Towards an integrated formal
theory of pragmatics. In Jae Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds.), OSU working
papers in linguistics, vol. 49: Papers in Semantics, 91–136. Columbus, OH:
37
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics. Revised 1998.
Rohde, Hannah, Scott Seyfarth, Brady Zack Clark, Gerhard Jäger & Stefan
Kaufmann. 2012. Communicating with cost-based implicature: A gametheoretic
approach to ambiguity. In The 16th workshop on the semantics and
pragmatics of dialogue, Paris.
Rojas-Esponda, Tania. 2012. A discourse model for überhaupt. Semantics and
Pragmatics .
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus: UMass Amherst dissertation.
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics
1(1). 75–116.
Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In Lappin (1996) 271–298.
van Rooy, Robert. 2003. Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguistics
and Philosophy 26(6). 727–763.
Rosenberg, Seymour & Bertram D. Cohen. 1964. Speakers’ and listeners’ processes
in a word communication task. Science 145. 1201–1203.
Russell, Benjamin. 2006. Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures.
Journal of Semantics 23(4). 361–382.
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter
Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics, 281–297. New York:
Academic Press.
Sauerland, Uli. 2001. On the computation of conversational implicatures. In
Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of
Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11, 388–403. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics
Circle.
Sauerland, Uli. 2010. Embedded implicatures and experimental constraints: A
reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla. Semantics and Pragmatics 3(2).
1–13.
Sauerland, Uli & Penka Stateva (eds.). 2007. Presupposition and implicature
in compositional semantics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Schulz, Katrin & Robert van Rooij. 2006. Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic
reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy
29(2). 205–250.
Sedivy, Julie. 2007. Implicatures in real-time conversation: A view from language
processing research. Philosophy Compass 2/3. 475–496.
Singh, Raj. 2008. On the interpretation of disjunction: Asymmetric, incremental,
and eager for inconsistency. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(2). 245–260.
Spector, Benjamin. 2007. Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology. In
Sauerland & Stateva (2007) 243–281.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition.
38
Conversational implicature: interacting with grammar
Oxford: Blackwell 2nd edn.
Sperber, Dan & Dierdre Wilson. 2004. Relevance theory. In Laurence R. Horn &
Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stiller, Alex, Noah D. Goodman & Michael C. Frank. 2011. Ad-hoc scalar implicature
in adults and children. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of
the Cognitive Science Society, Boston.
Stone, Matthew, Richmond Thomason & David DeVault. 2007. Enlightened
update: A computational architecture for presupposition and other pragmatic
phenomena. To appear in Donna K. Byron; Craige Roberts; and Scott
Schwenter, Presupposition Accommodation.
Thomason, Richmond H. 1990. Accommodation, meaning, and implicature:
Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan
& Martha E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, chap. 16, 325–363.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vogel, Adam, Max Bodoia, Christopher Potts & Dan Jurafsky. 2013a. Emergence
of Gricean maxims from multi-agent decision theory. In Human language
technologies: The 2013 annual conference of the North American chapter of
the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1072–1081. Stroudsburg, PA:
Association for Computational Linguistics.
Vogel, Adam, Christopher Potts & Dan Jurafsky. 2013b. Implicatures and nested
beliefs in approximate Decentralized-POMDPs. In Proceedings of the 2013
annual conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 74–80.
Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Wilson, Dierdre. 1975. Presuppositional and non-truth-conditional semantics.
New York: Academic Press.
Friday, September 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment