My marginalia to Chapman, p. 62.
"In many of his writings, Grice stuided use with as much zeal as Austin. But he saw use as a guide to what people often mean, no necessarly to what an expression does" (or words).
I treasure Grice in Reply to Richards.
"For I am the implicature man. A distinction, implication and implicature, apparently ignored by Witters, and all too seldom by Austin" (or words)
But still, while some like Witters, Austin's MY man!
ReplyDelete