Grice's Modified Occam's Razor
- Speranza
- Aquinas, T., Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, A.C. Pegis (trans.), New York: Random House, 1945.
- Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, R. McKeon (trans.), New York: Random House.
- Audi, R. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Baker, A., “Mathematics, Indispensability and Scientific Practice,” Erkenntnis, 55
- –––“Quantitative Parsimony and Explanation,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54
- –––Occam's Razor in Science: a Case Study from Biogeography,” Biology and Philosophy, 22
- Barnes, E., “Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle”, Erkenntnis, 53
- Baron, S. and Tallant, J., “Do Not Revise Ockham's Razor Without Necessity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
- Bilaniuk, O.-M. and Sudarshan, E. “Particles Beyond the Light Barrier,” Physics Today, 22
- Bunge, M., The Myth of Simplicity: Problems in Scientific Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Burgess, J., “Occam's Razor and Scientific Method,” in Schirn
- Cameron, R., “How to Have a Radically Minimal Ontology,” Philosophical Studies, 151 -- cfr. Grice's "Ontological Marxism": If entity x WORKS, x exists" in his "Method in philosophical psychology," repr. in "The conception of value."
- Derkse, W., On Simplicity and Elegance, Delft: Eburon.
- Dirac, P., “The Proton,” Nature, London, 126
- Fetzer, J. Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
- Fichman, M., “Wallace: Zoogeography and the Problem of Land Bridges,” Journal for the History of Biology, 10
- Fitzpatrick, S., “Kelly on Ockham's Razor and Truth-Finding Efficiency,” Philosophy of Science, 80
- Ford, K., “Magnetic Monopoles,” Scientific American, 209
- Forster, M., “The Curve-Fitting Problem,” in Audi
- –––The New Science of Simplicity,” in Zellner et al.
- Forster, M. and Sober, E., “How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45
- Friedman, M., Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Galileo, G., Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, S. Drake (trans.), Berkeley.
- Gauch, H., Scientific Method in Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Goodman, N., Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Goodman, N. and Quine, W., “Steps Towards a Reconstructive Nominalism,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12
- Grice, H. P. (1938). Negation. Provides a logical construction of "not" in terms of sense data and introspection.
- Grice, H. P. (1941). Personal identity, Mind. Provides a logical construction approach to "I".
- Grice, H. P. (1967). Modified Occam's Razor -- introduced in the third William James Lecture, Harvard. "Senses should not be multiplied beyond necessity."
- Grice, H. P. (1988). Aristotle on the multiplicity of being. PPQ. "French" has one SENSE, but different 'meanings-in-context.'
- Groarke, L. “Following in the Footsteps of Aristotle: the Chicago School, the Glue-stick and the Razor,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 6(3): 190–205.
- Holsinger, K., “The Blunting of Occam's Razor,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59
- Jansson, L. and Tallant, J. “Quantitative Parsimony: Probably for the Better,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
- Jeffreys, H., Theory of Probability, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kant, I., The Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith (trans.), New York: Humanities Press.
- Kelly, K., “Justification and Truth-Finding Efficiency: How Ockham's Razor Works,” Minds and Machines, 14
- –––“A New Solution to the Puzzle of Simplicity,” Philosophy of Science, 74
- Kemeny, J., A Philosopher Looks at Science, New York: Van Nostrand.
- Kragh, H., “The Concept of the Monopole: a Historical and Analytical Case-Study,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 12
- Kuhn, T., “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice,” in The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lange, M., “Spearman's Principle,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46
- Lavoisier, A., "Réflexions sur le Phlogistique,” in Oeuvres (Volume 2), 623–4, Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.
- Lewis, D., Counterfactuals, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Maurer, A., “Ockham's Razor and Chatton's Anti-Razor,” Mediaeval Studies, 46.
- McAllister, J. “Model Selection and the Multiplicity of Patterns of Empirical Data,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 884–894.
- Mendel, Gregor. Experiments in Plant Hybridisation, J. Bennett (ed.), R.A. Fisher (trans.), London: Oliver & Boyd.
- Nash, L., The Nature of the Natural Sciences, Boston: Little, Brown.
- Nelson, G. From Candolle to Croizat: Comments on the History of Biogeography,” Journal of the History of Biology, 11
- Newton, I., Principia Mathematica. New York: Citadel Press, 1964.
- Nolan, D. “Quantitative Parsimony”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48
- –––“Is Fertility Virtuous in its Own Right?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50
- Plutynski, A., “Parsimony and the Fisher-Wright Debate,” Biology and Philosophy, 20
- Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
- Quine, W.V.O., “On Simple Theories of a Complex World”, in The Ways of Paradox, New York: Random House.
- –––Theories and Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rescher, N., Complexity: a Philosophical Overview, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
- Riesch, H., “Simple or Simplistic? Scientists' Views on Occam's Razor,” Theoria, 67
- Sarkar, S. and Pfeifer, J. The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, London: Routledge.
- Schaffer, J., “Monism: The Priority of the Whole,” Philosophical Review, 119: 37–76.
- –––“What to Not Multiply Without Necessity,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93
- Schirn, M. (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Schlesinger, G., Method in the Physical Sciences, London: Routledge.
- Schulte, O. “Means-End Epistemology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50
- –––“The Co-discovery of Conservation Laws and Particle Families,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39
- Sider, T. “Against Parthood,” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8
- Smart, J. J. C. “Ockham's Razor,” in Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, ed. Fetzer.
- Sober, E., “The Principle of Parsimony,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32
- –––Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference. MIT Press.
- –––“Let's Razor Ockham's Razor”, in From A Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press.
- –––“What is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner et al.
- –––“Parsimony,” in Sarkar and Pfeifer.
- –––Ockham's Razors: A User's Manual, Cambridge University Press.
- Steel, D., “Testability and Ockham's Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38
- Swinburne, R., Simplicity as Evidence for Truth, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
- Thornburn, W., “The Myth of Occam's Razor,” Mind, 27.
- Vitányi, L. and Li, M., “Simplicity, Information, Kolmogorov Complexity and Prediction,” in Zellner et al.
- Walsh, D. “Occam's Razor: A Principle of Intellectual Elegance”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16.
- Woodward, J., Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford University Press.
- Zellner, A., Keuzenkamp, H. and McAleer, M. Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment