Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Grice's Modified Occam's Razor

  • Speranza

  • Aquinas, T., Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, A.C. Pegis (trans.), New York: Random House, 1945.
  • Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, R. McKeon (trans.), New York: Random House.
  • Audi, R. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baker, A., “Mathematics, Indispensability and Scientific Practice,” Erkenntnis, 55
  • –––“Quantitative Parsimony and Explanation,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54
  • –––Occam's Razor in Science: a Case Study from Biogeography,” Biology and Philosophy, 22
  • Barnes, E., “Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle”, Erkenntnis, 53
  • Baron, S. and Tallant, J., “Do Not Revise Ockham's Razor Without Necessity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
  • Bilaniuk, O.-M. and Sudarshan, E. “Particles Beyond the Light Barrier,” Physics Today, 22
  • Bunge, M., The Myth of Simplicity: Problems in Scientific Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Burgess, J., “Occam's Razor and Scientific Method,” in Schirn 
  • Cameron, R., “How to Have a Radically Minimal Ontology,” Philosophical Studies, 151 -- cfr. Grice's "Ontological Marxism": If entity x WORKS, x exists" in his "Method in philosophical psychology," repr. in "The conception of value."
  • Derkse, W., On Simplicity and Elegance, Delft: Eburon.
  • Dirac, P., “The Proton,” Nature, London, 126
  • Fetzer, J. Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
  • Fichman, M., “Wallace: Zoogeography and the Problem of Land Bridges,” Journal for the History of Biology, 10
  • Fitzpatrick, S., “Kelly on Ockham's Razor and Truth-Finding Efficiency,” Philosophy of Science, 80
  • Ford, K., “Magnetic Monopoles,” Scientific American, 209
  • Forster, M., “The Curve-Fitting Problem,” in Audi
  • –––The New Science of Simplicity,” in Zellner et al. 
  • Forster, M. and Sober, E., “How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45
  • Friedman, M., Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Galileo, G., Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, S. Drake (trans.), Berkeley.
  • Gauch, H., Scientific Method in Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodman, N., Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Goodman, N. and Quine, W., “Steps Towards a Reconstructive Nominalism,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12
  • Grice, H. P. (1938). Negation. Provides a logical construction of "not" in terms of sense data and introspection.
  • Grice, H. P. (1941). Personal identity, Mind. Provides a logical construction approach to "I".
  • Grice, H. P. (1967). Modified Occam's Razor -- introduced in the third William James Lecture, Harvard. "Senses should not be multiplied beyond necessity."
  • Grice, H. P. (1988). Aristotle on the multiplicity of being. PPQ. "French" has one SENSE, but different 'meanings-in-context.'
  • Groarke, L. “Following in the Footsteps of Aristotle: the Chicago School, the Glue-stick and the Razor,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 6(3): 190–205.
  • Holsinger, K., “The Blunting of Occam's Razor,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59
  • Jansson, L. and Tallant, J. “Quantitative Parsimony: Probably for the Better,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
  • Jeffreys, H., Theory of Probability, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Kant, I., The Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith (trans.), New York: Humanities Press.
  • Kelly, K., “Justification and Truth-Finding Efficiency: How Ockham's Razor Works,” Minds and Machines, 14
  • –––“A New Solution to the Puzzle of Simplicity,” Philosophy of Science, 74
  • Kemeny, J., A Philosopher Looks at Science, New York: Van Nostrand.
  • Kragh, H., “The Concept of the Monopole: a Historical and Analytical Case-Study,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 12
  • Kuhn, T., “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice,” in The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lange, M., “Spearman's Principle,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46
  • Lavoisier, A., "Réflexions sur le Phlogistique,” in Oeuvres (Volume 2), 623–4, Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.
  • Lewis, D., Counterfactuals, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Maurer, A., “Ockham's Razor and Chatton's Anti-Razor,” Mediaeval Studies, 46.
  • McAllister, J. “Model Selection and the Multiplicity of Patterns of Empirical Data,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 884–894.
  • Mendel, Gregor. Experiments in Plant Hybridisation, J. Bennett (ed.), R.A. Fisher (trans.), London: Oliver & Boyd.
  • Nash, L., The Nature of the Natural Sciences, Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Nelson, G. From Candolle to Croizat: Comments on the History of Biogeography,” Journal of the History of Biology, 11
  • Newton, I., Principia Mathematica. New York: Citadel Press, 1964.
  • Nolan, D. “Quantitative Parsimony”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48
  • –––“Is Fertility Virtuous in its Own Right?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50
  • Plutynski, A., “Parsimony and the Fisher-Wright Debate,” Biology and Philosophy, 20
  • Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
  • Quine, W.V.O., “On Simple Theories of a Complex World”, in The Ways of Paradox, New York: Random House.
  • –––Theories and Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rescher, N., Complexity: a Philosophical Overview, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Riesch, H., “Simple or Simplistic? Scientists' Views on Occam's Razor,” Theoria, 67
  • Sarkar, S. and Pfeifer, J. The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, London: Routledge.
  • Schaffer, J., “Monism: The Priority of the Whole,” Philosophical Review, 119: 37–76.
  • –––“What to Not Multiply Without Necessity,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93
  • Schirn, M. (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Schlesinger, G., Method in the Physical Sciences, London: Routledge.
  • Schulte, O. “Means-End Epistemology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50
  • –––“The Co-discovery of Conservation Laws and Particle Families,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39
  • Sider, T. “Against Parthood,” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 8
  • Smart, J. J. C. “Ockham's Razor,” in Principles of Philosophical Reasoning, ed. Fetzer.
  • Sober, E., “The Principle of Parsimony,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32
  • –––Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference. MIT Press.
  • –––“Let's Razor Ockham's Razor”, in From A Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press.
  • –––“What is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner et al.
  • –––“Parsimony,” in Sarkar and Pfeifer. 
  • –––Ockham's Razors: A User's Manual, Cambridge University Press.
  • Steel, D., “Testability and Ockham's Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38
  • Swinburne, R., Simplicity as Evidence for Truth, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
  • Thornburn, W., “The Myth of Occam's Razor,” Mind, 27. 
  • Vitányi, L. and Li, M., “Simplicity, Information, Kolmogorov Complexity and Prediction,” in Zellner et al. 
  • Walsh, D. “Occam's Razor: A Principle of Intellectual Elegance”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16. 
  • Woodward, J., Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford University Press.
  • Zellner, A., Keuzenkamp, H. and McAleer, M. Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

No comments:

Post a Comment