Kramer considers 'dead' in DWEM -- "Grice's Naturalism without Tears".
I argue that the feminists are wrong and, therein I argue, that Leibniz, though _dead_ was not really _European_.
Chapman seems to suggest that Grice's 'ambivalence' (p. 46 -- I'm getting closer to the beginning!) over things was about his DWEM-status:
"Grice's attitude to his social environment may have been, or have become, somewhat ambivalent"
-- his guilt over his DWEM-ness?
Or rather that, as for any pirot, his environment kept changing!
ReplyDelete