Speranza
One of Grice's unpublications is about conjunctions and disjunctions in the scope of non-doxastic attitude verbs.
These constructions generate a certain type of ignorance implicature.
Grice argues that the best way to account for these implicatures is by appealing to a notion of contextual redundancy (Schlenker, Fox, Mayr and Romoli).
This pragmatic approach to ignorance implicatures is contrasted with a semantic account of disjunctions under `wonder' that appeals to exhausti cation (Roelofsen and Uegaki).
Grice argues that exhausti cation-based theories cannot handle embedded conjunctions, so a pragmatic account of ignorance implicatures is superior.
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment